SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Chh) 401

DILIP RAOSAHEB DESHMUKH
PANKAJ LAKARA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF CHHATTISGARH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
ASHISH SHUKLA, J.K.Shastry


( 1 ) THIS appeal is directed against the judgment dated 25/4/2006 delivered by Shri G. C. Bajpal, Sessions Judge, jashpur in Sessions Case No. 101/2005 whereby the appellant was convicted under sections 363, 366, 376 (1) and 341, IPC and was sentenced under Sections 363, 366, 376 (1) to undergo rigorous imprisonment for two years, five years and seven years respectively and also to simple imprisonment for one month under Section 341, IPC. The sentences were ordered to run concurrently.

( 2 ) BRIEFLY stated the prosecution case is that on 26/7/2005 the prosecutrix, aged about 13 years, was sent by her mother kaldina P. W. 2 for bringing Soyabeen chunks from Khan Shop. The prosecutrix left her house on a cycle and after purchasing soyabeen chunks from Khan Shop was returning home. Near the school, the appellant Pankaj Lakda stood with one Pratap, the cousin brother of the prosecutrix. Pratap called her and asked to give her cycle to him. The prosecutrix gave her cycle to Pratap who left the place. The appellant thereafter held the hand of the prosecutrix and dragged her inside the school room. She attempted to shout but the appellant gagged her mouth. Inside the kitchen room of Prim




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top