SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Chh) 531

D.R.DESHMUKH
MITHILA DUBEY – Appellant
Versus
SHANTI bai – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
H.B.AGRAWAL, MANISH AGARWAL, R.K.KESHARWANI

( 1 ) HEARD.

( 2 ) BRIEF facts are that deceased Premraj rajeshwar Dubey was working as a peon in chhattisgarh State Electricity Board, Korba (West ). He had nominated the applicants i. e. his wife and children as nominees in the service record. On his death on 7-4-2004, the department asked for a succession certificate from the applicants herein who filed an application under Section 372 of the Indian succession Act before Civil Judge, class-I, Katghora, District Korba in Succession case No. 16/2004. The non-applicants herein resisted the application on the ground that non-applicant-Shanti Bai was wife of the deceased Premraj who had executed a will in favour of the non-applicants prior to his death.

( 3 ) THE learned Civil Judge, Class-I. Katghora on appreciation of evidence adduced by the parties held that the applicant mithila Dubey was the legally married wife of the deceased and the applicants No. 2 to 4 were children of the deceased. It was held that the non-applicant No. 1 Shanti Bai was not the legally married wife of the deceased and the non-applicant No. 2 Vinod was not the son of the deceased however the execution of a Will by deceased Premraj in favour of the non-appli







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top