SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Chh) 98

SUNIL KUMAR SINHA
R. K. SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF CHHATTISGARH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Arun Sao, V.C.OTALVAR

SUNIL KUMAR SINHA, J.

( 1 ) THESE are the two bail applications filed under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for grant of anticipatory bail to the applicants, who are apprehending their arrest in connection with crime No. 195/2006, registered at Police station-Dipka, District-Korba (CG) for the offence punishable under Sections 342, 294, 323 and 506-B read with Section 34 of the 1pc and Section 3 (l) (x) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities)Act, 1989 (hereinafter referred to as the 'special Act' ).

( 2 ) THE brief facts are that the complainant namely-Juiious Lakra was a Security Guard under a private agency known as 'thunderbolt security Services Camp Gevra, District-Korba'. The applicants were also working in the same concern. The victim was working in the said concern since 16. 6. 2004. On 3. 10. 2006, at about 8. 30 a. m. , the victim was called by the applicant-Pushpendra Singh, who said to him that now his services are no more required and he should take up his salary cheque and should leave the job. On this, the victim replied that he should be given his payment in cash. The allegations are that on account of this, the applicant













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top