SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Chh) 38

SUNIL KUMAR SINHA
PRAVEEN KUMAR SAHU – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF CHHATTISGARH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
D.C.PANDE, M.K.Bhaduri, Panel Lawyer

SUNIL KUMAR SINHA, J.

( 1 ) THIS is an application filed under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for grant of anticipatory bail to the applicant, who is apprehending his arrest in connection with Crime No. 21/2006, registered at Police Station-Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, District-Rajnandgaon (C. G.) for the offence punishable under Section 376 of the IPC and section 3 (1) (xii) of the Scheduled Castes and scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities)Act, 1989 (hereinafter referred to as the Special Act.

( 2 ) THE case of the prosecution is that on 15. 12. 2006, the prosecutrix lodged a report in the concerned Police Station that since 4 years to the said date, she was subjected to sexual intercourse by this applicant. It also comes in the First Information Report that she was taken by this applicant to Nagpur and they were residing as husband and wife since last 4 years, but ultimately, when she offered for a regular marriage, this applicant refused to marry her.

( 3 ) LEARNED counsel for the applicant submits that admittedly, according to the prosecution itself, the girl was aged about 21 years on the date of FJR, as in her trans














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top