SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Chh) 279

L.C.BHADOO
NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD. – Appellant
Versus
JASINTA KUJUR – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
SAURABH SHARMA, Shree Kumar

( 1 ) HEARD.


( 2 ) THIS appeal has been preferred by the new India Assurance Company Limited, aggrieved by the award dated 5-12-1995 passed by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Bastar (Jagdalpur) in claim case No. 10/90 (Smt. Jasinta Kujur v. Gurdeep Singh and Ors.)

( 3 ) BRIEF facts necessary for the disposal of this appeal are that on 20th February, 1990 at about 3. 30 p. m. Egenesh Ekka along with Harish Kujur were going on a motorcycle from their Village : Dhanora to dugol. One truck bearing registration No. MBY-9538 was coming from Bijapur opposite side. Driver of the truck was Gurdeep singh who was driving the truck rashly and negligently. He dashed the truck against the motorcycle TVS bearing registration No. UAU-3168 as a result of which Egnesh Ekka and Harish Kujur, who were on the motor cycle, were thrown on the ground. They sustained grievous injuries on head, chest and ribs as a result of which they succumbed to the injuries sustained by them, on the spot. Wife and children of Egnesh Ekka preferred an accident claim which was registered at serial No. 6/90.

( 4 ) AS Harish Kujur was bachelor residing with his brother and sister-in-law (Bhabhi) smt. Jasinla Kujur, there























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top