SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Chh) 257

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH
L. C. Bhadoo and Dhirendra Mishra, JJ.
SURJAN RAM - Appellant
Versus
STATE OF CHHATTISGARH - Respondents
with Crl. Revision 551 Of 2001
Decided On : APRIL 5, 2007

Advocates Appeared:
Gurudev Sharan, NEERAJ MEHTA, RAJESH PANDEY, Rajesh Tiwari, U.N.S.DEO

The judgment emphasizes the need for trustworthy evidence and the application of the two-witness theory in cases involving large numbers of offenders.

Headnote:

Conviction - Murder - IPC 147, IPC 302 - The judgment discusses the prosecution's case of a mob attack resulting in the deaths of four individuals and the subsequent trial. The court scrutinizes the evidence of witnesses and finds it lacking in credibility, leading to the acquittal of the accused appellants and the dismissal of the criminal revision. The court emphasizes the need for trustworthy evidence and the application of the two-witness theory in cases involving large numbers of offenders.

Fact of the Case:

The prosecution alleged a mob attack resulting in the deaths of four individuals. Witnesses provided testimony, but their credibility was questioned by the court. The accused appellants were convicted based on the testimony of eyewitnesses, but the court found the evidence lacking in credibility.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the prosecution failed to establish the crime against the accused appellants and acquitted them. The court emphasized the need for trustworthy evidence and the application of the two-witness theory in cases involving large numbers of offenders.

Issues: Credibility of witness testimony, application of the two-witness theory, establishment of motive behind the crime.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the need for trustworthy evidence and the application of the two-witness theory in cases involving large numbers of offenders. It also highlighted the importance of establishing the motive behind the crime.

Final Decision: The criminal revision was dismissed, and the accused appellants were acquitted of the charges. The court emphasized the need for trustworthy evidence and the application of the two-witness theory in cases involving large numbers of offenders.

L. C. BHADOO, J.

( 1 ) CRIMINAL Appeal No. 1106/2001 filed by Surjan Ram, Criminal appeal No. 1182/2001 filed by Bechan Ram, criminal Appeal No. 1211/2001 filed by achambhit Ram and Others and Criminal revision No. 551/2001 filed by Puranram and another are arising out of the same judgment dated 16. 10. 2001 passed by the additional Sessions Judge, Surajpur, District Surguja, in S. T. No. 7/2000, therefore, all the three appeals and revision are being disposed of by this common judgment.

( 2 ) THE accused-appellants have preferred these appeals questioning legality and correctness of the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 16. 10. 2001 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge Surajpur, district Surguja in S. T. No. 7/2000 whereby learned Additional Sessions Judge after convicting accused persons namely, Achambhit ram, Dharampal Das. Paldas, Nohar Das, surjan, Lakhan Ram, Harihar Das and bechan Ram for commission of offence under Sections 147 and 302 of the. P. C. for committing riot as members of unlawful assembly and for committing murders of ramnarayan, Amar Sai, Jagdhari and Palva @ Ramnath, sentenced each of the accused to undergo R.. for 1 year under Section 147 of the IPC and under Section 302 IPC to un- dergo imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs. 500, in default of payment of fine to further undergo RI for 5 months for each murder. However, learned Additional Session Judge acquitted accused persons namely, Chhotku @ Ramprasad, Hulas ram, Dhani @ Dhaneshwar, Bhorlu @ mohan Ram, Shyam Das @ Amdalha, dashai Ram, Ramdev and Baldev of all the charges.

( 3 ) THE case of the prosecution, in brief, is that on 2. 10. 1999 at about 5. 00 p. m. Ram- narayan, Amar Sai, Jagdhari and Palva @ ramnath (all deceased) along with Gulab das (PW 15) and Kripa Shankar Singh (PW16) went to village Sukhr. They were sitting at the residence of Bishun Ram (PW1 ). At that time, 200-300 persons carrying lathi, club and axe came on the spot. They started attacking Ramnarayan, Amar sai, Jagdhari, Palva @ Ramnath, Kripa shankar (PW16) and Gulab Das (PW15 ). First of all, they encircled Jagdhari, they attacked him, as a result of which he fell down, thereafter they attacked Ramnarayan and Palva @ Ramnath, they also fell down. Thereafter, they attacked Amar Sai in the field which was on the east side of the house, he also fell down. All the four persons succumbed to the injuries spontaneously. However, somehow, Kripashankar and Gulab managed to escape and ran away towards the forest. Kripashankar was carrying sword which was thrown by him in the house of Bishun, which was picked up by one Ramdev. Amar Sai was carrying gupti, same was taken by whom is not known. The accused persons having formed common object indulged in the Marpeet. Accused Chhotku, Achambhit, Dharmapal, his younger brother Pal, Pulas, Dhani, bhurlu, Shyam Gond, Nohar Das, Baldev, harijan, Surjan, Lakhanram, Dashai, Ramdev, Harihar and one Rorwa, resident of chirmiri were involved in the Marpeet. These persons attacked with Lathi and thenga.

( 4 ) MERG intimation ( Ex.-P/43) of the above fact was given by Bishun Ram. Dehati first Information Report (Ex-P/44) was given by Bishun Ram. Merg intimation Ex.- p/45 as also given by Bishun Ram, based on that First Information Report Ex. P 46 for commission of offence under Sections 302, 147, 148 and 149 of the. P. C. was registered. The Investigating Officer left for scene of occurrence and prepared site plan ex. P/47 of the place of occurrence. The 10 prepared inquest Ex. P/16 on the body of ramnarayan, Ex. P/17 on the body of Amar sai, Ex. P/18 on the body of Jagdhari and ex. P/19 on the body of Pava @ Ramnath. The dead bodies of Ramnarayan, Amar Sai, jagdhari and Palva @ Ramnath were sent for post-mortem examination to the District hospital, Ambikapur where team of doctors namely, Dr. Brijendra Kumar Shrivastava (PW10), Dr. N. K. Pandey and Dr. S. K. Sinha conducted post-mortem on the dead bodies of Ramnarayan, Amar S





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top