SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Chh) 530

D. R. DESHMUKH, J.
Smt. Mithila Dubey and Ors.
Versus
Smt.Shanti Bai and Anr.
Civil Revn. No. 110 of 2006
Decided in : 17-11-2006.

Advocates appeared:
R. K. Kesharwani, for Applicants; H. B. Agrawal, Sr.Counsel with Manish Agawal, for Non-applicants.

The determination of legal heirs for a succession certificate is based on the best title to the securities, considering the evidence of marital relationship and living arrangements of the deceased.

Headnote:

Succession Certificate - Family Dispute - The court held that the deceased's wife and children were the legal heirs entitled to the succession certificate, despite the existence of a will in favor of other parties. The court considered the evidence of the deceased's marital relationship and living arrangements to determine the best title for the succession certificate.

Fact of the Case:

The deceased's wife and children filed for a succession certificate, which was contested by other parties claiming rights based on a will executed by the deceased.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the deceased's wife and children were the legal heirs entitled to the succession certificate, despite the existence of a will in favor of other parties. The court considered the evidence of the deceased's marital relationship and living arrangements to determine the best title for the succession certificate.

Issues: Dispute over entitlement to a succession certificate, validity of the deceased's will, and determination of legal heirs.

Ratio Decidendi: The court considered the evidence of the deceased's marital relationship and living arrangements to determine the best title for the succession certificate, as required under Section 373(3) of the Indian Succession Act.

Final Decision: The court dismissed the application for the succession certificate in favor of the other parties and affirmed the rights of the deceased's wife and children as the legal heirs entitled to the succession certificate.

ORDER :- Heard.

2. Brief facts are that deceased Premraj Rajeshwar Dubey was working as a peon in Chhattisgarh State Electricity Board, Korba (West). He had nominated the applicants i.e. his wife and children as nominees in the service record. On his death on 7-4-2004, the department asked for a succession certificate from the applicants herein who filed an application under Section 372 of the Indian Succession Act before Civil Judge, Class-I, Katghora, District Korba in Succession Case No. 16/2004. The non-applicants herein resisted the application on the ground that non-applicant-Shanti Bai was wife of the deceased Premraj who had executed a Will in favour of the non-applicants prior to his death.

3. The learned Civil Judge, Class-I, Katghora on appreciation of evidence adduced by the parties held that the applicant Mithila Dubey was the legally married wife of the deceased and the applicants No. 2 to 4 were children of the deceased. It was held that the non-applicant No. 1 Shanti Bai was not the legally married wife of the deceased and the non-applicant No. 2 Vinod was not the son of the deceased however the execution of a Will by deceased Premraj in favour of the non-applicants was established. It also took into consideration that the applicant-Mithila Dubey had admitted in cross-examination that she had lived with her husband Premraj only for a period of five years after her marriage and thereafter, she was living separately in her maternal home since about 11 years with her children and had no relationship with her husband during this period. On these premises, the learned Civil Judge, Class-I, Katghora ordered issuance of a succession certificate in favour of the non-applicants for receiving the amount of Rs. 2,10,023/- from the Chhattisgarh State Electricity Board.

4. Aggrieved by the above order, the applicants herein preferred Miscellaneous Civil Appeal No. 02/2006 before the District Judge, Korba. The District Judge, Korba after an elaborate discussion of the evidence adduced by the parties affirmed the findings recorded by the learned Civil Judge Class-I, Katghora and dismissed the appeal.

5. Shri R. K. Kesharwani, learned counsel for the applicants has not been able to show that the 1st Appellate Court has exercised its jurisdiction either illegally or with material irregularity. The finding of execution of Will by the deceased in favour of the non-applicants based on the testimony of attesting witness Ram Lal and another witness Ganpat Singh can also not be faulted with. Both the Courts below have rightly taken into consideration the fact that Mithila Dubey had separated from her husband (deceased) and was living in her maternal home since 11-12 years. The execution of Will by the deceased in favour of the non-applicants has thus been proved prima facie by the non-applicants. There is thus nothing on record to show that the 1st Appellate Court has exercised its jurisdiction either illegally or with material irregularity. That being so this Civil Revision is liable to be dismissed at the stage of admission being devoid of any merit.

6. Proceedings under Section 372 of the Indian Succession Act are of a summary nature. Under Section 373 sub-clause (3) while deciding entitlement to the issuance of a succession certificate, the Court is required to consider prima facie the best title thereto.While deciding an application under Section 372 of the Indian Succession Act,1925, the Court is required to come to a conclusion as to which of the parties has prima facie the best title to the securities in respect of which the certificate is applied for. The evidence led by the non-applicants prima facie shows that the non-applicant No. 1 Shanti Bai was living with Premraj as his wife since long. In view of the fact that the applicant Mithila Dubey had admitted that she had separated from the deceased over a period

of 11 years and had no relationship with him, the execution of Will by the deceased in favour of Shanti Bai who

was livin





Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top