SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Chh) 553

VIJAY KUMAR SHRIVASTAVA
Vimala Devi – Appellant
Versus
Shobha Walia – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Bhaskar Payasi, for Applicant; H. B. Agrawal, Sr. Counsel with Pankaj Agrawal, for Non-Applicants.

ORDER :- This revision under Section 384 (3) read with Section 388 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 (henceforth, "the Act") is directed against the order dated 23-4-1996 passed by District Judge, Raipur, in Misc. Judicial Case No. 4/95 whereby an order for grant of succession certificate in favour of non-applicant Nos. 1 and 2 has been passed.

2. Rajan Yashpal, who was resident of Raipur, died on 18-6-1986. During his life- time he was doing the business of selling motor parts. He opened a locker with Dist. Co-operative Central Bank, Raipur. After his death non-applicant No. 1 Sobha Walia claiming herself to be the wife of Rajan Yashpal and non-applicant No. 2 Vikki claiming himself to be a minor child of Rajan Yashpal filed an application for grant of succession certificate under Section 372 of the Act, for access to the locker and to receive the ornaments kept therein. Applicant Vimala Devi claiming herself to be the mother of deceased Rajan Yashpal pleaded that during lifetime of her son Rajan Yashpal, marriage tie in between he son and Sobha Walia was broken by a divorce agreement in accordance with their custom. Non-applicant No. 2 namely Vikki is not son of Rajan Yashpal. Sh



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top