SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Chh) 154

H.L.DATTU, V.K.SHRIVASTAVA
United Transport Company – Appellant
Versus
Khatoon Begum – Respondent


Advocates appeared
Anand Mohan Tiwari, for Appellants; Ms. Sharmila Singhal, for Respondent.

Judgement

VIJAY KUMAR SHRIVASTAVA, J. :- This is an appeal under Section 39 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 (for short "Act 1940") against the judgment and decree dated 12-3-1999 passed by the First Additional District Judge, Jagadalpur in Civil Suit No. 4A/1984 whereby application filed by the appellant to set aside the award has been rejected and in term of award judgment and decree impugned has been passed.

2. Facts stated in brief are that respondent herein filed an application under Section 20 of the Act 1940 for appointment of an arbitrator to decide the arbitral dispute. The application was filed on 6-8-1984. After due hearing First Additional District Judge Jagadalpur, vide order dated 11-2-1986 appointed Shri P. C. Jain, Income Tax Practitioner as sole Arbitrator. Pursuant to his appointment, arbitrator proceeded to resolve the arbitral dispute and after due enquiry and hearing, passed an arbitral award and submitted the same to the Court of First Additional District Judge. The Court received it on 3-5-1990, and passed an order on that day that parties be called and notice of filing of award be communicated to them.

3. Pursuant to the order dated 3-5-1990 parties gave their appe




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top