SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(Chh) 294

SUNIL KUMAR SINHA
Farsuram – Appellant
Versus
State of Chhattisgarh – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Vivek Shrivastava, Advocate for the appellant Mr. Ajay Dwivedi, Dy. Govt. Advocate,

JUDGMENT

Following judgment of the Court was delivered by Sunil Kumar Sinha, J.

(1) Appellant Farsuram stands convicted u/s 376 IPC and sentenced to undergo R.I. for 7 years and to pay fine of Rs.500/- with default sentence of R.I. for 3 months, by the Second Additional Sessions Judge, Bastar at Jagdalpur on 28th of November, 2005 in Sessions Trial No. 121/2005. (2) The facts, briefly stated, are as under:- Prosecutrix (PW-1) was a married lady aged about 20 years. On 2.2.2005 at about 3.00 p.m., when she was returning from village Dongriguda to village Saatgaon, appellant Farsuram met her on the way near village Satli. The allegations are that he put her in fear and took her to a nearby field and committed sexual intercourse against her. The case of the prosecution is that after the intercourse, the prosecutrix ran away to one Pankuram, who was working in a nearby field, and narrated the story to him. Thereafter she narrated the story to her husband Jungaram (PW-2) and then, a First Information Report (Ex.-P/4) was lodged by the prosecutrix in the concerned police station at about 22.00 hours on 7.2.2005.

(3) The learned Sessions Judge recorded the conviction of the appellant on the









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top