SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Chh) 428

2008 (3) C.G.L.J. 16
HIGH COURT OF CHATTISGARGH AT BILASPUR
Shri L.C. Bhadoo & Shri S.K. Sinha JJ,

Narsingh Konda – Appellant
versus
State of Chhattisgarh – Respondent
Criminal Appeal No. 1164 of 2001
Decided on : 26/7/2007

Advocates Appeared:
Shri Vishnu Koshta
Shri D.K. Gwalre

The main legal point established in the judgment is the determination of the appropriate conviction based on the nature of injuries, the accused's intention, and the legal precedent in Karam Singh v. State of Punjab.

Headnote:

Conviction - Section 302 IPC - Section 304 Part II IPC - [Section 302, Section 304 Part II IPC] - The court discussed the nature of injuries, the intention of the accused, and the legal precedent in Karam Singh v. State of Punjab to determine the appropriate conviction. The court concluded that the accused had the knowledge that the inflicted injury may likely cause death, leading to a conviction under Section 304 Part II IPC instead of Section 302 IPC.

Fact of the Case:

The appellant appealed the judgment of conviction and order of sentence under Section 302 of IPC for causing the death of Kunwar Singh. The prosecution's case involved the appellant attacking the deceased with a lathi, resulting in his death. The appellant denied the allegations and claimed innocence.

Finding of the Court:

The court found the death of Kunwar Singh to be homicidal in nature based on ocular and medical evidence. It established the appellant's involvement in the crime beyond reasonable doubt.

Issues: The issues revolved around the intention of the accused in causing the death of the deceased and the appropriate section of IPC for conviction.

Ratio Decidendi: The court considered the nature of injuries, the part of the body where the injuries were inflicted, and the legal precedent in Karam Singh v. State of Punjab to determine the appropriate conviction under Section 304 Part II IPC.

Final Decision: The court set aside the conviction and sentence under Section 302 of IPC and instead convicted the appellant under Section 304 Part II of IPC, sentencing him to undergo R.I. for 7 years.

JUDGMENT

1. By this appeal, filed under Section 374(2) Cr.P.C. the appellant has questioned the legality and correctness of the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 23-11-2001, whereby, the learned Second Additional Sessions Judge (FTC), Bemetara, in ST. No. 319/2000, after holding the accused/appellant guilty for commission of the offence under Section 302 of IPC for causing death of Kunwar Singh, sentenced the appellant to undergo R.I. for life and to pay a fine of Rs. 5,000/- in default of payment of fine to further undergo R.I. for 1 year.

2. The case of the prosecution in brief is that on 8-8-2000, at about 8.00 a.m. the accused/appellant went in front of the house of Kunwar Singh (since deceased) and called him. On hearing the call of the accused, Kunwar Singh came out of the house. The accused asked Kunwar Singh as to why he has diverted the course of water towards his field from accused field, on which, Kunwar Singh replied that he had not diverted the course of water towards his field. The accused/appellant asked Kunwar Singh that if he had not diverted the course of water, he should go to Mahamaya Temple, say so it firmly before the deity in the temple. On that Kunwar Singh started going towards Mahamaya temple, by the time, hardly he could cover 20 steps, the accused/appellant said you are a liar, abused him in the name of mother and sister and attacked him with lathi, as a result of which, Kunwar Singh fell down on the ground. Thereafter, the accused/appellant assaulted Kunwar Singh 3-4 times with lathi and ran away from the place of occurrence. The witnesses Umed and Rewaram lifted Kunwar Singh and took him to his house, family members of Kunwar Singh were informed, who were in their agricultural field. They came and took Kunwar Singh to the Primary Health Centre, Temri. The matter was reported to the Police Station Nandghat by his nephew-Lakhan, which was entered in the Roznamcha Sana under Ex. P/2,2. After entering the report in Roznamcha Sana, Head Constable Manmohan Singh was sent to the site. Manmohan Singh, after reaching the site, sent the Dehati Nalisi Ex. P/1 to the SHO. Based on that, crime No. 81/2000 was registered. Halka Patwari, prepared the site plan Ex. P/2. The requisition Ex. P/4-A was sent for medical examination of Kunwar Singh on which, he was medically examined and the medical report Ex. P/4 was prepared by Dr. N.P. Jangde (P.W. 8). While in the police custody, the accused gave memorandum under Ex. P/6-A. Based on that, Police recovered lathi, weapon of offence under Ex. P/7. However, in the meantime, Kunwar Singh succumbed to the injuries in the hospital. The Investigating Officer, after giving notice Ex. P/13 to the Panchas, prepared inquest Ex. P/14 on the body of Kunwar Singh. The body of Kunwar Singh was sent for postmortem under Ex. P./12-A, where Dr. S.K. Sharma, (P.W. 12) conducted the post-mortem and prepared the report Ex. P/11. a baniyan of the accused was seized under Ex. P/15.

3. After completion of the investigation, charge-sheet was filed against the accused/appellant in the Court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bemetara, who in turn, committed the case to the Sessions Judge, Durg from where the learned Second Additional Sessions Judge, Bemetara received the case on transfer for trial.

4. The prosecution in order to establish the charge against the accused/appellant examined as many as 14 witnesses. The statement of the accused was recorded under Section 313, Cr.P.C. in which, he denied the material appearing against him in the prosecution evidence and stated that he is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the case. In defence, one Shakil Mohammad was examined, who has stated that on the fateful day, Narsingh was going towards the village. He saw that people of Rawat community were chasing him to attack, on which, he asked Narsingh to go to the police station and therefore, Narsingh went to the Police Station Nandghat.

5. The learned Additional Sessions



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top