SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(Chh) 11

2008 (1) C.G.L.J. 485
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
Dhirendra Mishra, J.
Biharilal Pradhan
Versus
Kalyani
Criminal Revision No. 298 of 2002
Decided on : 17/1/2008

Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Manoj Paranjpe, Advocate, for the Applicant.
Mr. Sunil Sahu, Advocate, for the Non-applicant.

The amendment to Section 125, which enhanced the ceiling of monthly maintenance, is applicable to pending proceedings, allowing for the subsequent enhancement of maintenance granted under un-amended provisions.

Headnote:

Maintenance - Criminal Procedure - Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - Section 127 - Section 125 - 125, 127 - The court discussed the provisions of Section 125 and Section 127 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, and the amendment that enhanced the ceiling of monthly maintenance from Rs. 500 to Rs. 3,000. The court held that the amendment is intended to be applicable to pending proceedings, and thus, the amount of maintenance granted under un-amended provisions of Section 125 of the Code can be subsequently enhanced as per the amended provision.

Fact of the Case:

The applicant challenged an order directing him to pay enhanced maintenance to the non-applicant under Section 127 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the amendment to Section 125, which enhanced the ceiling of monthly maintenance, is applicable to pending proceedings, and thus, the amount of maintenance granted under un-amended provisions of Section 125 of the Code can be subsequently enhanced as per the amended provision.

Issues: The main issue was whether the amount of maintenance awarded under un-amended provisions of Section 125 of the Code before 30-5-1998 could be subsequently enhanced on a petition filed by the applicant under Section 127 of the Code after the amendment.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the amendment to Section 125 is intended to be applicable to pending proceedings, and thus, the amount of maintenance granted under un-amended provisions of Section 125 of the Code can be subsequently enhanced as per the amended provision.

Final Decision: The court dismissed the petition, finding it without any substance.

ORDER

Dhirendra Mishra, J.

1. By this criminal revision the applicant has impugned the order dated 15-4-2002 passed in Criminal Case No. 34/02 whereby learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Mahasamund has allowed the application preferred by the non-applicant under Section 127 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short 'the Code') and directed the applicant to pay the maintenance @ Rs. 1,000/- per month to the non-applicant from the date of filing of the application.

2. Learned Counsel for the applicant submits that the non-applicant's application for maintenance was allowed and the High Court vide order dated 7-11-1984 passed in Criminal Revision No. 25/83 directed the applicant to pay maintenance @ Rs. 200/- per month. Her application under Section 127 of the Code was further allowed by the Judicial Magistrate, Mahasamund vide order dated 8-9-1997 passed in Criminal Case No. 106/90 and the applicant was directed to pay maintenance @ Rs. 400/- per month. Non-applicant further moved an application under Section 127 of the Code before the Judicial Magistrate on 20-9-2001 for enhancement of the maintenance amount and the same was also allowed by the impugned order and the amount of maintenance was enhanced from Rs. 400/- to Rs. 1,000/-.

3. The only ground urged by the applicant is that the maintenance was granted to the non-applicant before 30-5-1998 when the amendment in Section 125 of the Code came into force and ceiling of monthly maintenance @ Rs. 500/-was enhanced to Rs. 3,000/-. Amended provisions are applicable only in the proceedings which are pending after 30-5-1998 and in relation to the orders which have been passed after 30-5-1998 and for the purposes of orders passed under the un-amended Section 125 of the Code maximum ceiling of Rs. 500/-per month maintenance would apply. Reliance is placed on the judgment in the matter of Ramfool Moolchand Mina v. Smt. Jagrati Ramfool Mina reported in 2001 (2) M.P.H.T. 234 : 2001 (1) M.P.L.J. 304.

4. On the other hand, learned Counsel for the non-applicant argued that Section 127 of the Code makes a provision for alteration in allowance granted as maintenance under Section 125 of the Code due to change in circumstances and the Magistrate considering the change in circumstances can direct the husband to pay maintenance at the enhanced rate, if the wife establishes by adducing evidence about the change in circumstances. In the present case a meager sum of Rs. 400/- was awarded in the year 1997 when salary of the applicant was only Rs. 3,500/-, however, considering that cost of living had increased since then and the salary of the applicant was also increased to Rs. 8,500/-, the amount of maintenance has been increased. On the date of deciding this application the maximum limit of maintenance amount under Section 125 of the Code was increased from Rs. 500/- to Rs. 3,000/- and, therefore, there was no impediment before learned Magistrate in enhancing the amount of maintenance.

5. I have heard learned Counsel for the parties.

6. The short question to be considered in this criminal revision is whether amount of maintenance awarded under un-amended provisions of Section 125 of the Code before 30-5-1998 could be subsequently enhanced on a petition filed by the applicant under Section 127 of the Code after coming into force of the amended provisions of the Code?

7. The above question is to be answered in the light of the Statement of Objects and Reasons formulated by the Stale of Madhya Pradesh for amending the provisions of Section 125 of the Code and enhancing the amount of Rs. 500/- to Rs. 3000/- by the Code of Criminal Procedure, (Madhya Pradesh Amendment) Act, 1997 (No. 10 of 1998). The Statement of Objects and Reasons arc as under:

Statement of Objects and Reasons.--According to the provisions of Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, the maintenance allowance of Wives, Children or Parents is payable at such monthly rate not exceeding 500/- rupees. Since the existing amo





Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top