DHIRENDRA MISHRA
Biharilal Pradhan – Appellant
Versus
Kalyani – Respondent
Dhirendra Mishra, J.
1. By this criminal revision the applicant has impugned the order dated 15-4-2002 passed in Criminal Case No. 34/02 whereby learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Mahasamund has allowed the application preferred by the non-applicant under Section 127 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short 'the Code') and directed the applicant to pay the maintenance @ Rs. 1,000/- per month to the non-applicant from the date of filing of the application.
2. Learned Counsel for the applicant submits that the non-applicant's application for maintenance was allowed and the High Court vide order dated 7-11-1984 passed in Criminal Revision No. 25/83 directed the applicant to pay maintenance @ Rs. 200/- per month. Her application under Section 127 of the Code was further allowed by the Judicial Magistrate, Mahasamund vide order dated 8-9-1997 passed in Criminal Case No. 106/90 and the applicant was directed to pay maintenance @ Rs. 400/- per month. Non-applicant further moved an application under Section 127 of the Code before the Judicial Magistrate on 20-9-2001 for enhancement of the maintenance amount and the same was also allowed by the impugned order and the amount
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.