SUNIL KUMAR SINHA
Narayan Vishvnath Rajput – Appellant
Versus
State of Chhattisgarh – Respondent
Sunil Kumar Sinha, J.
1. This judgment shall govern the disposal of both the criminal appeals as they arise out of a common judgment dated 8th August, 2001 passed by the Special Judge (SC & ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act), Raipur in Special Sessions Case No. 82/2000, whereby, the appellants were convicted under Section 376(2)(g) IPC, and sentenced to undergo R.I. for 10 years and to pay a fine of Rs. 5,000/-, in default of payment of fine to further undergo R.I. for 6 months.
2. The appellants were charged under Section 376(2)(g), IPC read with Section 3(2)(v) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (hereinafter referred to as the Special Act.
3. The brief facts are that at the relevant time, the prosecutrix, Smt. Sunita Bai (P.W. 8) was working as a labour in a Plywood Factory. She had joined the said work just 2 days prior to the date of incident. Some construction work was going on in the factory, in which the appellant Narayan was working as a Mason. The allegations are that on 22-8-2000 at about 1.00 p.m. Narayan called the prosecutrix for sweeping in a particular room. Firstly, she denied saying that he may call other labour b
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.