SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Chh) 265

SATISH K.AGNIHOTRI
Narayan – Appellant
Versus
State of Chhattisgarh – Respondent


ORDER

Satish K. Agnihotri, J.

1. By this petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners impugn the order dated 3.10.2001 (Annexure P-1), 8.12.2000 (Annexure P-2), 30.3.1995 (Annexure P-3), 24.7.1991(Annexure P-4) and 3.7.1991(Annexure P-5) passed by the respondents No. 2 to 4, whereunder the appeal filed against the order dated 24.7.1991 passed by the Sub Divisional Officer, Mahasamund was dismissed as being barred by time and review petition filed thereafter was also dismissed by the Additional Commissioner, Raipur Division, Raipur.

2. The indisputable facts in nutshell are that the father of the respondent No.5 Late Shri Dalganjan sold the agriculture land bearing Khasra No. 415 admeasuring 2.33 acres in Patwari Halka No. 40/39 to Shri Bharat Ram Aghariya father of the petitioners vide registered sale deed dated 22.4.1963 (Annexure P-7).

3. The respondent No. 4 i.e. Sub Divisional Officer, Mahasamund issued a show cause notice under the provisions of under Section 170-B of the Madhya Pradesh Land Revenue Code, 1959 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Code, 1959') to the father of the petitioners to file his reply on or before on 24.7.1991. Before issue of s




























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top