V.K.SHRIVASTAVA
Pradeep Balvandere – Appellant
Versus
Kundu Bai Mishrat – Respondent
1. This revision under Section 23E of the Chhattisgarh Accommodation Control Act, 1961 (henceforth "the Act") has been filed by the tenant/applicant challenging the propriety, illegality and correctness of the impugned order dated 1-3-2006 passed by Rent Controlling Authority, Raipur (henceforth "the Authority") in Case No. 9-90(8) 2004-05, whereby order of eviction has been passed in favour of the landlord/respondent.
2. Fact material for disposal of this revision as unfolded before the Authority is that the respondent claiming herself to be the landlord in accordance with Section 23J of the Act, filed an application under Section 23A of the Act for recovery of possession of the suit accommodation, averring that the suit accommodation is required bonafide for starting business of her major son Kamlesh Kumar and she has no other suitable alternative accommodation available in the city. Applicant/tenant was served with notice in accordance Section 23-C of the Act. Admittedly, notice was served on the tenant/applicant, but he did not file any application for grant of leave to contest the application filed by the landlord/respondent for recovery of the possession of the suit accom
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.