SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Chh) 439

DHIRENDRA MISHRA
Sherali – Appellant
Versus
Saiyad Israrali – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Shri J.S. Baraik,for the Appellants.
Shri Akhil Agarwal, Panel Lawyer,for the State

JUDGMENT

1. Heard on admission.

2. This second appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure has been filed against the judgment and decree dated 30-11-2005 passed by the Additional District Judge, Mungeli in Civil Appeal No. 12-A/2005 whereby the appeal preferred by the appellants against the judgment and decree dated 21-9-2004 dismissing the Civil Suit No. 7-A/1988 passed by the Trial Court has been dismissed.

(The parties hereinafter shall be referred to as per their description before the Trial Court.)

3. Briefly stated the case of the plaintiff is that the suit land described in Schedules A and B of the plaint was ancestral property of late Gafur Ali. It was never partitioned. The widow of Gafur Ali is an old lady and was incapable of taking any decision. Gafur Ali died issueless. The defendant does not belong to the family of the plaintiffs and late Gafur Ali never made any gift with respect to 2.15 acres of land. The gift deed dated 18-7-1984 is fake. Gafur Ali was suffering from paralysis in the year 1983-84. Gafur Ali never made oral declaration about gifting the suit land to the defendant and the defendant has illegally got his name recorded over the suit land. Khat

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top