SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Chh) 456

D.MISHRA
Uttam Chand Luniya – Appellant
Versus
Roshanlal Verma – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Dhirendra Mishra, J.

1. The appellant/plaintiff has preferred this appeal against the order dated 6-5-2006 passed in Civil Suit No. 2-A/06 by First Additional District Judge, Rajnandgaon whereby the application of the appellant/ plaintiff under Order 39, Rules 1 & 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure for grant of temporary injunction has been rejected. (Parties hereinafter shall be referred to as per their description before the trial Court).

2. The plaintiff filed a suit for specific performance of the contract agreement with respect to the suit land with the averments that plaintiff and defendant No. 1 entered into a contract agreement dated 15-7-2003 to sell the suit land bearing Khasra No. 218/1, area 1.82 acres situated at village Sahaspur, for a consideration of Rs. 76,000/-. A subsequent agreement was again entered into between the parties on 30-7-2003 to sell the land bearing Khasra No. 218/2, area 1.81 acres situated at village Sahaspur, for a consideration of Rs. 76,000/-. The plaintiff has paid the full consideration at the time of said agreements and the defendant No. 1 promised to execute the sale deed in the name of the persons as directed by the plaintiff and also










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top