D.MISHRA
Uttam Chand Luniya – Appellant
Versus
Roshanlal Verma – Respondent
Dhirendra Mishra, J.
1. The appellant/plaintiff has preferred this appeal against the order dated 6-5-2006 passed in Civil Suit No. 2-A/06 by First Additional District Judge, Rajnandgaon whereby the application of the appellant/ plaintiff under Order 39, Rules 1 & 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure for grant of temporary injunction has been rejected. (Parties hereinafter shall be referred to as per their description before the trial Court).
2. The plaintiff filed a suit for specific performance of the contract agreement with respect to the suit land with the averments that plaintiff and defendant No. 1 entered into a contract agreement dated 15-7-2003 to sell the suit land bearing Khasra No. 218/1, area 1.82 acres situated at village Sahaspur, for a consideration of Rs. 76,000/-. A subsequent agreement was again entered into between the parties on 30-7-2003 to sell the land bearing Khasra No. 218/2, area 1.81 acres situated at village Sahaspur, for a consideration of Rs. 76,000/-. The plaintiff has paid the full consideration at the time of said agreements and the defendant No. 1 promised to execute the sale deed in the name of the persons as directed by the plaintiff and also
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.