SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Chh) 425

S.K.SINHA
Bharat Ram Sahu – Appellant
Versus
Salik – Respondent


ORDER

Sunil Kumar Sinha, J.

1. This is the plaintiffs second appeal filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The plaintiff lost in both the Courts. This appeal arises out of the judgment and decree dated 29-11-2005 passed by the VIII Additional District Judge (FTC), Raipur (CG) in Civil Appeal No. 8-A/2004 arising out of judgment and decree dated 28-7-2000 passed in Civil Suit No. 9-A/97 by the VII Civil Judge Class-II, Raipur (CG).

2. The brief facts are that the plaintiff filed a suit for specific performance of an agreement dated 3-7-1988 (Ex. P4) alleged to have been executed by defendant Nos. 1 and 2 and their more. Smt. Kachhra Bai. The plaint allegations are that these persons entered into an agreement to sale of certain agricultural land situated at Village Joundi, P.C. No. 154, Tehsil Rajim, District Raipur (CG), for a consideration of Rs. 3000/-. Since after many requests made by the plaintiff, the defendant Nos. 1 and 2 did not execute the sale-deed pertaining to the aforesaid agreement, the plaintiff was constrained to file the instant suit for the specific performance.

3. A written statement was filed denying the contentions of the plaintiff. The factum of e












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top