SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Chh) 402

S.SINHA
Viseshar Yadav – Appellant
Versus
Govind Swami – Respondent


JUDGMENT

S.K. Sinha, J.

1. This is the defendant's first appeal filed Under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure. It arises out of the judgment and decree dated 14-10-1993 passed by second Addl. District Judge, Bilaspur, in Civil Suit No. 3-A/1990. By the said judgment and decree, the trial Court decreed the suit for specific performance of an agreement dated 30-5-1988.

2. The brief facts are that the plaintiff filed a suit for specific performance of the aforesaid agreement dated 30-5-1988 allegedly entered into between the plaintiff and defendant for sale of a house situated in Talapara. Bilaspur, for a consideration of Rs. 25,000/- The plaintiff inter alia pleaded that after entering into the written agreement dated 30-5-1988 (Ex. P. 1), a sum of Rs. 5000/- was received as an advance by the defendant and it was agreed between them that a registered sale deed shall be executed within a period of one year from the said date, after receiving the remaining amount of consideration. The plaintiff further pleaded that thereafter on 27-10-1988, the defendant again received a sum of Rs. 13,614/- from him and made an endorsement to this effect on the back portion of the agreement dated















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top