SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Chh) 462

D.MISHRA
Khitti Sahu – Appellant
Versus
Yashwant Kumar Sahu – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Dhirendra Mishra, J.

1. The appellant-non-applicant No. 1, Khitti Sahu has preferred this appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, against the order dated 1.8.1998 passed by Additional Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Mahasamund in Claim Case No. 10 of 1996 whereby the learned Tribunal while deciding preliminary issue No. 7 regarding maintainability of the claim petition before the Claims Tribunal has held that the claim petition was maintainable.

2. That respondent No. 1 herein had filed a claim case under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act claiming compensation of Rs. 5,00,000 on the pleading that he was working as a tractor mechanic in the shop of appellant herein where respondent No. 2 herein brought his tractor-trolley for being repaired and while respondent No. 1 herein was fitting the bearing in the wheel of the tractor by removing the same and the tractor was standing over the jack, all of a sudden the tractor slipped from the jack and the tractor-trolley fell on the respondent No. 1 as a result of which he sustained serious injuries on the backbone. It was claimed by respondent No. 1-applicant that he was working under the directions of the appell









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top