SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Chh) 81

2005(2) C.G.L.J. 27
HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH, JABALPUR
K.K. Lahoti, J.
Rama Prasanna Tiwari – Appellant
Vs.
Smt. Ashima And Anr. – Respondents
Writ Petition No. 4865 of 2004
Decided on : 24/2/2005

The main legal point established in the judgment is that the Family Court is required to follow the procedure as envisaged under Section 126 of the Cr.PC for proceedings under Chapter IX, Cr.PC.

Headnote:

Section 126 - Family Court Procedure - Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - [Section 126, Cr.PC] - The court discussed the provisions of Section 10 of the Family Courts Act, 1984 and Section 126 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. It highlighted that the Family Court is required to follow the procedure as envisaged under Section 126 of the Cr.PC for proceedings under Chapter IX, Cr.PC. The court set aside the order of the Family Court and directed it to record the evidence as per Section 126 of the Cr.PC.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner challenged the order passed by the Family Court, which rejected the application filed by the petitioner under Section 126 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the Family Court had committed an error in directing the parties to file affidavit in evidence and permitting the other party to cross-examine on affidavit. It held that the Family Court is required to follow the procedure as envisaged under Section 126 of the Cr.PC for proceedings under Chapter IX, Cr.PC.

Issues: The main issue was the adoption of the procedure by the Family Court for recording evidence in proceedings under Chapter IX of the Cr.PC.

Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was based on the interpretation of Section 10 of the Family Courts Act, 1984 and Section 126 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, which specifically provides the procedure for proceedings under Chapter IX of the Cr.PC.

Final Decision: The court set aside the order of the Family Court and directed it to record the evidence as per Section 126 of the Cr.PC.

ORDER

K.K. Lahoti, J.

1. Petitioner has challenged order dated 30-10-2004 passed by the Family Court, Rewa in Case No. 1/2004 by which the Family Court has rejected the application filed by the petitioner under Section 126 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as 'Cr.PC').

2. Before the Family Court, an application under Section 125, Cr.PC has been filed by the respondents for maintenance. In the said proceedings, the respondents filed their affidavit in evidence and petitioner has been directed to cross-examine on the affidavit. At this stage, petitioner raised an objection in writing that in the proceedings, evidence can not be taken on affidavit, but the respondent should be examined in the Court in the presence of petitioner or his Counsel. Family Court relying on Section 10(3) of the Family Court Act found that the Family Court is having jurisdiction to adopt its own procedure for recording evidence and relying on provisions of Code of Civil Procedure held that the affidavit can be received in evidence and rejected the application of the petitioner. This order is under challenge in this petition.

3. Learned Counsel for petitioner submits that under Sub-section (2) of Section 10 there is specific provision that subject to the other provisions of this Act and the Rules, the provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 or the Rules made thereunder, shall apply to the proceedings under Chapter IX of that Code before the Family Court. Section 125 falls under Chapter IX of the Cr.PC and the procedure envisaged under Section 126, Cr.PC shall apply in the proceedings and not the provisions of Code of Civil Procedure. It is submitted that order passed by the Family Court be set aside and the matter be remitted back to the Family Court to decide the matter in accordance with law.

4. Learned Counsel appearing for respondents supported the order and submitted that in view of Sub-section (3) of Section 10 of the Family Courts Act, the Family Court has rightly adopted the procedure and there is no fault in the procedure. Petitioner shall get the opportunity to cross-examine on the affidavit. This will save the time of the Trial Court and no prejudice shall be caused to the petitioner.

5. To consider the rival contentions of the parties, Section 10 of the Family Courts Act, 1984 may be seen :

"Section 10. Procedure generally.-- (1) Subject to the other provisions of this Act and the Rules, the provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 and of any other law for the time being in force shall apply to the suits and proceedings (other than the proceedings under Chapter IX of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973) before a Family Court and for the purposes of the said provisions of the Code, a Family Court shall be deemed to be a Civil Court and shall have all the powers of such Court.

(2) Subject to the other provisions of this Act and the rules, the provision of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 or the Rules made thereunder, shall apply to the proceedings under Chapter IX of that Code before a Family Court.

(3) Nothing in Sub-section (1) or Sub-section (2) shall prevent a Family Court from laying down its own procedure with a view to arrive at a settlement in respect of the subject matter of the suit or proceedings or at the truth of the facts alleged by the one Party and denied by the other."

Aforesaid provisions specifically provide that in the proceedings under Chapter IX of Cr.PC before a Family Court, provisions of Code of Criminal Procedure and the rules made thereunder shall apply. This is specific provision under the Act which provides the procedure for the proceedings under Chapter IX of the Cr.PC. Though Family Courts are vested with the powers to decide the matter under Hindu Marriage Act and other Acts, but so far as proceedings under Chapter IX of the Cr.PC are concerned, there is specific provision to adopt same procedure as envisaged in the Cr.PC. For the proceedings under Section 125 of the Cr.








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top