SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Chh) 52

FAKHRUDDIN
Gopal Vishvas – Appellant
Versus
State Of Chhattisgarh – Respondent


ORDER

Fakhruddin, A.C.J.

1. Heard.

2. This petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. has been filed by the applicant against the order dated 2-12-2004 passed by the learned First Addl. Sessions Judge, Sarguja, Ambikapur in Criminal Rev. No. 348/2004 whereby the revision filed against the order dated 4-11 -2004 passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ambikapur has been rejected.

3. Counsel for the applicant submitted that applicant is the person who is carrying on the business of Television Network. An-nexure A-2 is the registration certificate issued by the District Excise Officer. It is submitted that he is the authorized Cable Operator by Z TV to telecast its Channels. It is stated that he is doing the business lawfully. It is further submitted that there is another competitor namely Vande Matram, who does not want the applicant to carry on the business. It is submitted that at his behest, the police have acted and registered the offence under Section 16 of Cable Television Networks Regulation Act, 1995 and Sections 63 and 68A of the Copyright Act. On 1-11-2004, the Sub-Inspector searched the place from where the applicant was carrying business and seized the Decoder and 57 other articl
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top