L.C. Bhadoo, J.

1. The petitioner has preferred this criminal revision being aggrieved by the order dated 25-3-2004 passed by the Special Judge (Atrocities), Bilaspur, in Criminal Revision No. 111/2004, whereby the learned Special Judge allowed the revision of respondent Nos. 2 to 4 and reversed the order of the Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Katghora, passed in Criminal Case No. 225 of 2004 on 1-3-2004, directed that the cattle in question be handed over to the revisionists as they are the owners of the cattle and further directed that each of the revisionists should execute Supurdginama to the tune of Rs. 2 lakhs to the satisfaction of the Judicial Magistrate and they were further directed that during the disposal of the criminal case without the permission of the Court they will not transfer or sale or otherwise dispose of the cattle which are 270 in number.

2. Brie facts leading to filing of this criminal revision, necessary for its disposal are that on 22-12-2003 at about 1.10 p.m. at Village Vilmata when respondent Nos. 2 to 4 along with other six persons were taking 146 bulls, 110 cows, 10 she-calves and 4 calves, they were stopped by certain persons and cattle was tak