SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(Chh) 82

FAKHRUDDIN
Sirajunnisha – Appellant
Versus
Sukhjeet Singh – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Fakhruddin, J.

1. Heard on M.C.P. No. 501 of 2002 for grant of interim relief.

2. It is submitted that the appellant was the tenant, and the respondent has disconnected the electricity supply from the suit house, which the appellant is in possession and she is residing therein with her children. It is further submitted that the daughters of the appellant are pursuing studies and preparing for examinations and in the absence of essential service like electricity they are facing great inconvenience. It is stated that there is separate meter and amount was offered towards electricity charges but the power has not been supplied.

3. Counsel for the appellant relied on Dilbag Singh vs. Badri Parsed, 1987 (2) MPWN 219, wherein it has been held that there is no law prohibiting the tenant from taking connection for supply of water to the premises hired by him, it must be deemed that for the purpose of the tenancy for the user of the premises, essential supply of services can be claimed by the tenant from the landlord and if that is refused, from the Court.

4. Section 37 of the M.P. Accommodation Control Act prescribes 'Landlord's duty to keep accommodation in good repair' and requires e





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top