SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(Chh) 38

VACATION, FAKHRUDDIN
Radha Mohan Rais – Appellant
Versus
State Of Chhattisgarh – Respondent


ORDER

Fakhruddin, Vacation J.

Heard.

1. In the instant case the petitioners have been convicted for the commission of the offence punishable under Sections 225/34, IPC and have been sentenced to undergo Simple Imprisonment for two years with fine of Rs. 200/-, in default of payment of fine to further undergo SI for one month each and such conviction attracts the Provision of Section 35 & Section 38 (1) (b) of the M.P. Nagarpalika Adhiniyam, 1961 which reads as under:--

"Section 35(hh) : No person shall be eligible for election or as a President or election or nomination as a Councillor, if he has been convicted by Court in India for any offence not falling under clause (h) and sentenced to imprisonment for a period not less than two years unless a further period of six years has elapsed since his release after under going the sentence."

"Section 38 (1) (b): If any Councillor becomes subject to any of the disqualification specified in Section 35 and such disqualification is not removable or being removable is not removed."

2. The conviction has not been stayed or suspended. The applicant has preferred an Appeal No. 676/2001. Counsel for the applicant has filed the only document Annexure P





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top