R.S.GARG
Santosh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Chhattisgarh – Respondent
R.S. Garg, J.
1. The applicant being aggrieved by the order dated 6-7-2001 passed by the learned Third Additional Sessions Judge, Jagdalpur in Sessions Trial No. 297 of 2001 rejecting the applicant's application filed under Section 91 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, has come to this Court.
2. During the course of the trial the applicant/accused made an application before the Trial Court inter alia submitting that the evidence collected during the course of the inquest has not been filed by the prosecution along with the charge-sheet and as the same is required to be filed for just and proper disposal of the trial and the said statements may be required for the purposes of cross-examination the prosecution agency be directed to produce the said documents before the Court. The said application was opposed by the prosecution mainly on the ground that the prosecution agency was not obliged to file each and every document but was required to file those documents on which they were placing reliance. It was also submitted before the Court below that when an inquest is made under Section 174 of the Code of Criminal Procedure the evidence collected or the statements recorded during th
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.