SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Chh) 92

DESHMUKH
DEVKI BAI – Appellant
Versus
BALRAM SINGH GOND – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Shri Bharat Rajput, Advocate, for the Applicant.
Shri Akhil Agrawal, Panel Lawyer, for the State/non-applicant No.9.

ORDER

1. This Civil Revision is being disposed of finally today at the stage of admission.

2. Brief facts are that upon dismissal of Civil Suit No. 38-A/2001 vide judgment and decree dated 27-04-2001 by 4th Civil Judge Class-II, the appellant plaintiff preferred First Appeal (Civil Appeal No. 60-A/2004) on 30-06-2001. During the pendency of this appeal, respondent No.6 Kunja Bai died on 20-01-2003. An application was filed by the appellant-plaintiff on 09-09-2004 along with an application under Section-5 of the Limitation Act for bringing the legal representatives on record. It was stated therein that the appellant was a household lady and was suffering from heart disease and other ailments and had no knowledge about the death of respondent No. 6-Kunja Bai. The First Appellate Court took a purely technical view and held that there was no sufficient ground to condone the delay in making an application for setting aside the abatement of appeal.


3. The matter is squarely covered by the decision rendered by the Apex Court in Ram Nath Sao alias Ram Nath Sahu and Others Vs. Gobardhan Sao and Others wherein the Apex Court held as under :-

"The expression "sufficient cause" within the mean







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top