L.J.SINGH
RAMRATAN MEHSRAM – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF M. P. – Respondent
1. The applicant has filed this petition with a prayer that the respondents be ordered to pay the amount of anticipatory pension, pension, gratuity: family benefit, Provident Fund, leave encashment, and surrendered leave of 9 months. The arrears of increments from the year 1989 to 1994 and T.A. bill for return to home after retirement and T.A. bills for attending the D.E. He has also prayed that the respondents be ordered to send N.O.C. to the respondent no. 6, so that the amount of pay order received by the Treasury Officer since 236-97 be paid to the applicant.
2. Main contention of the applicant is that the applicant retired as a Naib Tahsildar from 31-3-94. For Payment of commuted pension of Rs. 39,162/ - and family benefit of Rs. 37,487/- pay order has been received by the Treasury Officer of Durg. The Treasury Officer, Durg, respondent no. 6 wrote a letter to the respondent no. 4 and the respondent no. 4 wrote a letter to the respondent no. 5 Tahsildar Manendragarh but due to act of the respondent no. 5 Tahsildar Manendragarh the N.O.C. has not been sent to the Treasury Officer, Durg, hence the applicant failed to receive above amounts.
3. Further contention of the applic
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.