SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Chh) 300

V.K.AGARWAL, VEENA MISRA, R.S.AWASTHI
VIRENDRA CHANDRA MAJUMDAR – Appellant
Versus
KARVY COMPUTER SHARE – Respondent


ORDER

As per Hon'ble Shri V.K. AgarWal, President :-

1. This appeal has been preferred under section 15 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, against the order dated 21.7.2005, passed in complaint No,54/05 by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Raipur (hereinafter referred to as the "District Forum" for short) dismissing the complaint.

2. Brief facts necessary for disposal of this appeal are that the complainant had applied to OP No.3 for allotment of 730 shares in his name and had sent a sum of Rs, 13,870/- vide draft No. 858205 of the SBI dated 8,9.2004, It was alleged in the complaint that the bid application, together with the draft was submitted with the OP No,2 but due to negligence of the said OP neither shares were allotted in the name of the complainant not the money was returned, It was further alleged that even despite enquiry from the OP No, 1 and 2 complainant could not get proper reply hence he wrote a letter to the OP No.3 and 4 on 30.10.2004 but did not receive satisfactory compliance till 15.12.2004. Consequently the complainant got legal notice dated 15.12.2004 served through his counsel Ku. M.V. Deshpandey but as nothing concrete was done the compla
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top