2006(3) C.G.L.J. 515
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BlLASPUR
D.R. Deshmukh, J.
SHIVNATH SHAH & ANOTHER - Appellants
Vs.
STATE OF C.G. - Respondent
Criminal Appeal No. 55 of 2006,
Decided on : 22-8-2006.
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act - Conviction under Section 20(b)(ii)(C) - Section 8(C) - Section 52 - Section 55
Fact of the Case:
The appellants were convicted under Section 20(b)(ii)(C) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act. The police intercepted a car and found contraband ganja. The appellants were charged, but the prosecution's evidence was challenged, and the court found serious irregularities in the investigation.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the guilt of the appellants beyond a reasonable doubt. It highlighted serious irregularities in the investigation, including non-compliance with legal provisions regarding the seizure and handling of the contraband, and the possibility of false implication of the appellants to shield the real culprits.
Issues: Non-compliance with legal provisions, lack of evidence supporting the prosecution's case, and the possibility of false implication.
Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the importance of strict compliance with legal provisions, especially in cases involving severe penalties. It highlighted the need for transparency in the investigation and the duty of the officer-in-charge of the police station to handle seized articles. The court also noted the failure to elicit crucial information from the accused during examination.
Final Decision: The appeal was allowed, the conviction was set aside, and the appellants were acquitted.
1. The appellants have preferred this appeal, being aggrieved by the judgment dated 28-12-2005 delivered by the Special Judge (N.D.P.S. Act), Durg in Special Case No.02/2005 whereby the appellants were convicted order Section 20(b)(ii)(C) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act. 1985 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) read with Section-8(C) thereof and sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for 12 years each and a fine of Rs.1 lakh and in default to undergo rigorous imprisonment of three years. The appellants have preferred this appeal.
2. Brief facts are that on 30-12-2004 Sub Inspector M.K. Dhruv PW-7 of Police Station-Chhawni while on mobile checking at Power House, Bus Stand, Bhilai at about 6 P.M. received secret information that contraband ganja was being transported from Raipur in Tata Indica Car bearing Registration No.C.G.08/0139. He recorded the secret information at 06.10 P.M. vide Ex.P-17 and sent infoffi1ation thereof to his superiors vide Ex.P-18. Witness Siyaram Singh PW -1 and Vipin Singh PW-2 were summoned vide Ex.P-I to remain present at the time of raid. The Tata Indica Car bearing Registration No. C.G.-08/0139 coming from Raipur was intercepted soon thereafter in presence of the abovementioned witnesses and Head Constable Ashok Yadav PW-8 and Constable Sohrab Khan PW-9. The occupants appellant Vijay Menon and co-accused Rane @ Ranjit on seeing the police fled. Driver appellant Shivnath was apprehended. After preparing panchnama vide Ex.P-2 for affecting the search without obtaining a search warrant and giving notice to the appellant Shivnath Shall @ Munna, a search of the Tata Indica Car was conducted. 28 boodles wrapped in newspaper were found in the dicky, and below the seats. Panchnama Ex.P-6 was prepared. Sub Inspector M.K. Dhruv PW -7 on personal experience felt that the bundles contained ganja and prepared panchnama vide Ex.P-7. The seized contraband ganja was taken to the shop of Rajendra Paswan PW-3 at Tea Market, Old Chhawni, for weighment who found that the total weight of the ganja in 28 boodles was 180 Kilograms. Weighment Panchnama was prepared vide Ex.P-8. Two samples of 50 grams each from 28 bundles were separated and panchnama Ex.P-9 was prepared. 56 samples thus prepared and the remaining ganja contained in 28 bundles was sealed by M.K. Dhruv, PW-7. Seal Panchnama EX.P-10 was prepared. 56 sealed sample packets and the remaining ganja contained in 28 sealed bundles and Tata Indica Car bearing Registration No.C.G.-08/0139 were seized on the spot i.e. in front of Project Automobiles vide seizure memo Ex.P-11. Appellant-Shivnath Shal1 was arrested vide Ex.P-12. On 30-12-2004, 28 boodles and 56 sample packets taken there from were entrusted in sealed condition for safe custody at the malkhana of Police Station-Chhawni to Head Constable Manharan lal Yadav PW -5 who entered it in the malkhana register Ex.P-19-C. On 31-12-2004, 56 sample packets were entrusted to Constable Narrotam Singh PW-6 for being taken to the Forensic Science Laboratory, Raipur for chemical analysis which was delivered by him at the Forensic Science Laboratory, Raipur on 03-01-2005. Vide report EX.P-26 of Forensic Science Laboratory, Raipur, it was opined that all the 56 sample packets contained ganja.
3. Charge sheet was filed only against the appellant Shivnath Shah since other co-accused Rane @ Ranjit and appellant Vijay Menon were absconding. Appellant Vijay Menon was arrested and produced before the learned trial Judge on 21-03-2005. Rane @ Ranjit remained absconding during the trial.
4. Appellants Shivnath Shah and Vijay Menon were charged under Section 20(b)(ii)(C) read with Section-8(C) of the Act. Both appellants abjured the guilt. The prosecution examined 9 witnesses. One Arun Kumar Mishra D. W.-1 was examined by the appellants who deposed that the police had apprehended appellant Shivnath Shah from his house at about 9 P.M. on the assertion that contraband ganja had been seized from a car whose
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.