SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Chh) 304

D.R.DESHMUKH
PARWEJ ALAM – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF C. G. – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Shri Arun Kochar, for the Applicant.
Shri Ashish Shukla, G.A for the State ..

ORDER

This revision is finally heard today at the stage of admission.

It is directed against the judgment dated 21.3 .2006 passed by 12th Additional Sessions Judge, (F.T.C.), Durg in Criminal Appeal Number - 394/ 2004 whereby the conviction of the applicant under Section - 34(a) of Chhattisgarh Excise Act was maintained while reducing the sentence awarded by the trial Judge to the sentence already undergone by the applicant and fine of Rs. 25,000/- and in default of payment of fine to undergo simple imprisonment for 3 months was awarded.

Brief facts are that on 21-6-2001 upon receiving secret information Sub Inspector K.R. Kanwar PW-6 seized 384 quarters of Goa Special Whisky Kept in 8 cartons from the possession of the applicant at Gautam Nager, Near Sulabh, P.S. Supela. The seized liquor was sent for analysis to the Excise Sub Inspector Lav Kumar Mishra, PW -5 who opined that the seized liquor was foreign liquor. After completion of investigation, the applicant was prosecuted under Section 34(a) of Chhattisgarh Excise Act.

Shri Arum Kochar, learned counsel for the applicant has assailed the conviction of applicant on the ground that the prosecution has not led any cogent evidence















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top