SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(Chh) 231

IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
Manindra Mohan Shrivastava, J.
Amol Ratre
Vs.
State of C.G.
Criminal Appeal No. 254 of 2007 Alongwith Criminal Appeal No. 310 of 2007
Decided On: 08.10.2010

The main legal point established in the judgment is that the prosecution must prove the seizure of contraband beyond reasonable doubt, and non-compliance with statutory provisions and lack of physical evidence can raise serious doubts about the prosecution's case.

Headnote:

NDPS Act - Conviction under Section 20(b)(ii)(C) - Summary of Acts and Sections: NDPS Act, 1985, Section 20(b)(ii)(C) - The court found the prosecution's case doubtful due to discrepancies and contradictions in the evidence, non-production of physical evidence, and violation of statutory mandates. The testimony of the investigating officer did not inspire confidence, and the case lacked credibility. The conviction was set aside, and the appellants were acquitted.

Fact of the Case:

The appellants appealed against their conviction and sentence under Section 20(b)(ii)(C) of the NDPS Act. The prosecution's case was based on the seizure of a large quantity of ganja from the appellants' possession during a police operation.

Finding of the Court:

The court found the prosecution's case doubtful due to discrepancies and contradictions in the evidence, non-production of physical evidence, and violation of statutory mandates. The testimony of the investigating officer did not inspire confidence, and the case lacked credibility.

Issues: The issues included the genuineness of the seizure, non-compliance with statutory provisions, lack of physical evidence, and the credibility of the investigating officer's testimony.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the prosecution failed to prove the seizure beyond reasonable doubt due to discrepancies, non-compliance with statutory provisions, and lack of credibility in the evidence. The non-production of physical evidence without proper explanation raised serious doubts about the prosecution's case.

Final Decision: The court set aside the conviction and order of sentence, acquitting the appellants of the charges. The appellants were ordered to be released from jail if not required in any other case.

JUDGMENT

Manindra Mohan Shrivastava, J.

1. The Appellants in the aforesaid two appeals have filed their respective appeals against the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 23rd march 2007 passed by Special Judge (NDPS) and Additional Sessions Judge, Bilaspur in Special Case No. 31/06 by which each of the Appellants have been found guilty and convicted for commission of offence under Section 20(b)(ii)(C) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substance Act, 1985 (hereinafter referred to as "the N.D.P.S. Act") and have been sentenced to undergo R.I. for 10 years with a fine of Rs. 1 lac and in default of payment of fine, additional R.I. for 1 year.

2. The case of the prosecution is that the Station House Officer-Inspector S. L. Chouhan of Police Station - Kota received information on 15.9.2006 that three persons are transporting ganja kept in white ambassador car No. M.P. 18/6262 and going towards Shahdol. Upon receipt of the information, a panchnama was prepared vide Ex.P-2 and information regarding receipt of such information was sent vide Ex.P-3 to senior police officer namely S.D.O (P), Kota and also informed at forest barrier, Kota as also to senior Superintendent of Police, Bilaspur on wireless and then investigating officer proceeded to the spot along with the police team. Upon enquiry at Achanakmar barrier, it was informed that the said car has been taken towards Lamni by opening the barrier. Thereafter, the suspected persons and the vehicle were chased by the S.H.O. along with his team. On way, the said ambassador car was located and the driver of vehicle having seen police vehicle ran towards forest road of Lamni- Khongsara and met with an accident on a culvert near barrier. Three suspected persons came out with 3 bags in their hand and went towards bushes and concealed the three bags. Two bags of ganja was recovered and a Panchnama in Ex.P-12 was prepared. The three suspected persons being the accused of these criminal appeals were held- up and enquired in presence of witnesses and forest officials working at Lamni barrier. They disclosed their names as Lal Bahadur Yadav, Mukul Gupta & Amol Ratre. Notice under Section 50 of the NDPS Act was given and their consent was obtained for their personal search vide Exs. P-5, P-6 & P-7. Thereafter, the investigating officer S.L. Chouhan (P.W.5) and the accompanying staff and witnesses offered themselves for being searched by the accused persons and search memo in Exs. P-8, P-9 & P-10 were prepared. From the possession of accused Lalbahadur Yadav, 15 kg. of ganja kept in a jute bag was found; from possession of accused Mukul Gupta 10 kg of ganja kept in a jute bag was found; from possession of accused Amol Ratre, 10 kg of ganja kept in a plastic bag was found whereupon, recovery memo in Exs. P-13, P-14 & P-15 were prepared. From each of the bags, small quantity was taken and was identified as ganja by smell and physical verification and a panchnama to this effect was prepared in Ex.P-16. In all three bags, a total quantity of 71 k.g. ganja was found upon weighment and a panchnama in Ex.P-1 was prepared. Samples were drawn from each of the bags recovered from the accused and kept in the car and 4 samples, each of 250 grams were prepared and sealed vide seizure memo of Exs. P-19, P-20 & P-21. On a notice in Ex.P-25 given to the accused persons, no licence could be produced. As the investigating officer found that prima facie commission of offence under Section 20(b)(ii)(C) of the NDPS Act is made out, accused persons were arrested vide memo of arrest Exs. P -22, P-23 & P-24.

3. The investigating officer returned to police station along with the accused persons, seized ganja & witnesses, and FIR in Cr. No. 217/2000 was registered in Ex.P-30 and an information to that effect was recorded in rojnamcha sanha No. 605 maintained in the police station. Seized ganja along with samples was handed-over to Head Constable-Moharrir of Malkhana in the police station and entry to this













































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top