SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(Chh) 44

PRITINKER DIWAKER
Gore Lal – Appellant
Versus
State of C. G. – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Pritinker Diwaker, J.

1. The present appeal arises out of the judgment and order dated 31.07.2008 passed by Additional Sessions Judge (FTC), Bilaspur in Sessions Trial No. 226/2007 convicting the accused/Appellants for the offence under Sections 498-A and 304-B of IPC and sentencing each of them to undergo rigorous imprisonment for two years and to pay fine of Rs. 1,000 Under Section 498-A and to undergo rigorous imprisonment for seven years Under Section 304-B, in default of payment of fine to further undergo rigorous imprisonment for two months. Both the sentences were directed to run concurrently.

2. Brief facts of the case are that marriage of the deceased Anita Bai was solemnized with Appellant No. 2, Vinod Kumar in the month of March, 2005. Appellant Nos. 1, Gore Lal and Appellant No. 3, Tulsi Bai are the father-in-law and mother-in-law of the deceased Anita Bai. It is alleged that on 16.07.2007 the deceased consumed some poisonous substance as a result of which she died that day itself. Merg intimation Ex. P-14 was given by Chamra Sahu (PW-4)- the father of the deceased and after preliminary investigation, FIR Ex. P-15 was registered on 01.08.2007 against the accused p

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top