SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(Chh) 39

N.K.AGARWAL
Deepak Kumar Jha – Appellant
Versus
Archana Jha – Respondent


ORDER

N.K. Agarwal, J.

1. Legality and propriety of the order dated 23.12.2010, passed by Civil Judge Class-Il, Patan, Distt. Durg, in Civil Suit No. 9-A/2010, whereby the applicant's application filed under Order 7 Rule 11(D) read with Section 151 of Code of Civil Procedure has been dismissed, is under assail in the instant petition.

2. According to the applicant, earlier Civil Suit was filed by the Respondent No. 1 in the court of Civil Judge, Class II, Durg. The applicant herein objected that the suit property is situated in village Urla, Teh. Patan, therefore, Durg Civil Court has no jurisdiction to hear the matter. An application under Order 23 Rule 1 of Code of Civil Procedure was filed by the Respondent for withdrawal of the suit on the ground that the Durg Civil Court has no jurisdiction to try the suit and only Patan Civil Court has jurisdiction to try the suit. The court permitted him for withdrawal of the suit on the ground that since the property in dispute is situated in village Urla, Teh. Patan, therefore Civil Court, Patan has jurisdiction to hear the suit, and thereafter, the instant suit has been filed by the Respondent before the Patan Civil Court. The applicant app



Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top