SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(Chh) 112

T.P.SHARMA, R.L.JHANWAR
Anjordas – Appellant
Versus
State of C. G. – Respondent


JUDGMENT

T.P. Sharma, J.

1. Challenge in this appeal is to the judgment of conviction & order of sentence dated 3.11.2004 passed by the 10th Additional Sessions Judge (F.T.C.), Bilaspur in Sessions Trial No. 307/2003, whereby & whereunder learned 10th Additional Sessions Judge after holding the Appellants guilty for commission of culpable homicide amounting to murder of Chandraram, Shyamratan, Kunjbihari and Dhaniram in sharing common intention convicted them under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code., 302 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 302 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 302 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code and 323 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life and fine of Rs. 500/- in default of payment of fine to further undergo S.I. for two months for each conviction under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code and fine of Rs. 200/-, in default of payment of fine to undergo S.I. for one month under Section 323 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code

2. Conviction is impugned on the ground that without there being any iota of evidence, the trial C














































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top