SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(Chh) 120

PRITINKER DIWAKER
Anand Prakash Mishra – Appellant
Versus
State of C. G. – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Pritinker Diwaker, J.

1. The Appellant calls in question the legality, validity am propriety of the judgment and order dated 27.12.2006 passed by Special Judge constituted under the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe (Prevention of Atreeities) Act] {for brevity "the Act"}, Bilaspur, in Special Case No. 65/2004 convicting him for the offence punishable under Section 376 IPC and sentencing to undergo rigorous imprisonment for seven years and pay fine of Rs. 200. in default of payment of fine to further undergo rigorous imprisonment for or. year.

2. Factual matrix in narrow compass goes thus. On 16.3.2004 a written report Ex. P-9 was lodged by the prosecutrix (PW-14) aged about of years at the relevant time, to the effect that the accused/Appellant with was the classmate of her brother Abhishek Badge (PW-3) in Engineering College, Bilaspur and staying in her house, used to subject her to rape since November 2003, as a result of which she was carrying the pregnancy of three and a half months. Based on this written report, FIR (Ex. P-7) was registered against the accused/Appellant for the offences under Sections 376 IPC as well as 3(2) (5) and 3 (1) (XII) of the Act and after com















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top