PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA
CHHAYA RAI – Appellant
Versus
BINDA PRASAD GUPTA – Respondent
1. The present second appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure has been preferred by the plaintiff Smt. Chhaya Rai, who is suffering a decree passed by the trial Court on 3-9-1998 decreeing the counter-claim of defendant No.1 Binda Prasad Gupta. The said judgment and decree dated 3-9-1998 passed by the trial Court in Civil Suit No.8-A/98 has been affirmed by the first appellate Court vide the impugned judgment and decree dated 237-2002 in Civil Appeal No.80-A/2002.
2. The facts of the case, in nutshell, are that the suit land bearing Khasra No.771 area 1.01 acre situated at Satipara, Ambikapur was purchased by the plaintiff vide sale-deed dated 14-6-1989 for Rs. 30,000/- from Smt. Bhinsari, widow of Manjhidas. Possession of the land was delivered, however, defendant No.1 tried to interfere with the possession of the plaintiff by digging foundation to construct a wall on the suit land on 31-7-1989 giving rise to filing of the present suit.
3. Defendant No.1 denied the plaint allegations. He claimed ownership over the suit land by virtue of sale-deed dated 26-8-1988 from Manjhidas, son of Budhansai. According to the said defendant, he is in possession of the suit
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.