SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(Chh) 276

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
Sunil Kumar Sinha & Radhe Shyam Sharma, JJ.
MATI RATRE & ANOTHER : Appellants
Vs.
STATE OF C.G. : Respondent
Criminal Appeal No. 429 of 2009
Decided on : 7-11-2012

Advocates appeared:
Shri Amit Sharma, Advocate, for the Appellant No. 1.
Ms. Sangeeta Mishra, Advocate, for the Appellant No. 2.
Smt. Madhunisha Singh, Panel Lawyer, for the State/respondent.

The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement for the testimony of a solitary witness to be reliable and the potential need for corroboration in certain circumstances.

Headnote:

Conviction - Murder - Section 460 IPC, Section 302/34 IPC - Summary of the acts and sections referenced and discussed by the court: The court discussed the reliance on the testimony of a solitary witness, the requirement for corroboration in certain circumstances, and the credibility of witness testimony. The court referred to legal provisions under the Indian Evidence Act and cited relevant case laws to support its decision.

Fact of the Case:

The deceased persons were found murdered in their courtyard, and the appellants were convicted based on the testimony of a sole eyewitness, Nandkunwar (PW-3). The defense argued that her late disclosure of the incident raised suspicions about the credibility of her testimony.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the testimony of the sole eyewitness was not reliable and lacked credibility due to her non-disclosure of the assailants' names and the delay in recording her statement. The court concluded that the conviction based solely on her testimony could not be sustained.

Issues: The key issue was the reliability of the sole eyewitness testimony and the requirement for corroboration in the absence of multiple witnesses.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the need for the testimony of a solitary witness to be true and reliable, and in certain circumstances, it may require corroboration. The court cited relevant case laws to support its decision.

Final Decision: The appeal was allowed, and the convictions and sentences of the appellants were set aside. They were acquitted of the charges, and the court ordered their release from jail.

JUDGMENT

Radhe Shyam Sharma, J.

1. This appeal is directed against judgment dated 10-4-2009 passed by Additional Sessions Judge, Sakti in Sessions Trial No. 139/2008. By the impugned judgment, accused persons/appellants Mati Ratre and Sanjay have been convicted and sentenced in the following manner with a direction to run the sentences concurrently:-

Conviction Sentence

Under Section 460 IPC Imprisonment for life and to pay fine of Rs. 500/-,

in default of payment of fine, to further undergo rigorous imprisonment for 6 months

Under Section 302/34 IPC Imprisonment for life and to pay fine of Rs. 500/-,

(For deceased Tijram) in default of payment of fine, to further undergo

rigorous imprisonment for 6 months

Under Section 302/34 IPC Imprisonment for life and to pay fine of Rs. 500/-,

(For deceased Nanbai) in default of payment of fine, to further undergo

rigorous imprisonment for 6 months

2. Case of the prosecution, in brief, is as under:

On 22-5-2008, between 1:00 A.M. to 4:00 A.M., deceased persons Tijram and Nanbai were sleeping in the courtyard of their house situated at Village Chhote Sipat. In the morning, at about 5:00 AM., dead bodies of deceased Tijram and Nanbai were found in the courtyard smeared with blood. Blood was oozing out from the neck and mouth of deceased Tijram and it appeared that the injuries were caused by sharp cutting weapon. Blood was oozing out from right side of the neck of deceased Nanbai and it appeared that the injury was caused by sharp cutting weapon. Merg intimations (Ex.P-1 and P-2) informed by Baratram were recorded in Police Station Malkharauda, on which, First Information Report (Ex.P-3) was also registered on the same day. The Investigating Officer reached the place of occurrence, gave notices (Ex.P-41 and P-43) to Panchas and prepared inquests (Ex.P-42 and P-44) on the dead bodies of the deceased Tijram and Nanbai, respectively. The dead bodies of deceased Tijram and Nanbai were sent to Community Health Centre, Malkharauda for post mortem examination vide Exs.P-4 and P-6, respectively. Dr. R.P. Kurre (PW-5) conducted post mortem on the dead bodies of the deceased and gave his reports (Ex.P-5 and P-7). He found multiple incised wounds on both the dead bodies. He opined that cause and mode of deaths of the deceased persons were syncope due to excessive hemorrhage and their deaths were homicidal in nature.

In further investigation, the appellants were taken into custody and memorandum statement (Ex.P:18) of appellant Mati Ratre was recorded under Section 27 of the Evidence Act and at his instance, blood stained Rumal, Kantop, white Rumal, blue plastic chappal, black pant and iron Gandasa were seized vide Ex.P-21. Memorandum statement (Ex.P-19) of appellant Sanjay was recorded under Section 27 of the Evidence Act and at his instance, blood stained iron weapon, burnt clothes of appellant Sanjay and burnt chappal were seized vide Ex.P-22 and P-23. Memorandum statement (Ex.P-20) of Vinay Nirala was recorded and at his instance, blood stained blue pant and blue T-shirt were seized vide Ex.P-24. Clothes of the deceased persons were seized vide Ex.P-30. Nails of appellants Mati Ratre and Sanjay and Vinay Nirala were seized vide Ex.P-31. Blood stained soil, plain soil and broken pieces of bangles were seized from the place of occurrence vide Ex.P-40. Spot map (Ex.P-38) was prepared by Patwari Dhandas Nirala (PW-13). The seized articles were sent to the Forensic Science Laboratory, Raipur for chemical examination vide Ex.P-49.

After completion of the investigation, charge sheet was filed against the appellants in the Court of Judicial Magistrate First Class, Sakti, who, in turn, committed the case to the court of Session, Janjgir-Champa, from where it was received on transfer by Additional Sessions Judge, Sakti, who conducted the trial and convicted and sentenced the appellants as mentioned above.

Charge sheet was also filed against the co-accused Vinay Nirala in Juvenile Court.

3. Shri Amit Sharma and M

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top