Sujoy Paul
Shakuntalabai – Appellant
Versus
Chatur Singh – Respondent
1. In this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution, the case of the petitioner is as under:-
The petitioner is the owner of land along with other family members. The land is in Survey No. 697/02 min area 10141 hectare. A Power of Attorney was executed by the petitioner in favour of Hemsingh, whereby he was authorised to look after the land, but no authority for alienating the land was given to him. This Power of Attorney was also subsequently cancelled. Hemsingh alienated the land in the name of his own son and some other persons. The son of Hemsingh, i.e., Balveer Singh (respondent No.3) and other persons got their names mutated in the revenue record. No information is given to the petitioner in the mutation proceedings before recording the names of respondents in the revenue record. The petitioner feeling aggrieved with the said action of the Tehsildar preferred an appeal before the Sub-Divisional Officer (SDO) bearing Appeal No. 99/05. The appeal aforesaid was filed by all the owners of the land and the SDO after hearing the parties by order dated 24-5-2006 allowed the appeal and set aside the mutation order made in favour of respondent Nos. 1 to 4. The matter w
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.