Sujoy Paul
Dinesh Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Sarveshari – Respondent
1. By filing this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution, the petitioner has called in question the order of the Revenue Board dated 1-5-2012.
2. Brief facts necessary for adjudication of this matter are as under:-
The petitioners claim is that the father of petitioners, namely, Prahlad and his brothers Raghunath and Keshav were owners of the land bearing survey Nos. 386 and 387, situated in Village Kutdhan, Patwari Halka No. 24, Tehsil Sabalgarh, District Morena. Respondent Nos. 1 to 5 got their names mutated in revenue record on the said survey numbers. When the petitioners came to know about the said mutation, they preferred an appeal before Sub-Divisional Officer (SDO), which was registered as Appeal No. 45/ 2008-09. The Appellate Court initially granted temporary injunction but ultimately dismissed the appeal by order dated 4-12-2009 on merits. Feeling aggrieved with the order of SDO aforesaid, the petitioner preferred an appeal before Additional Commissioner, Chambal Division, which was registered as Appeal No. 28/2009-10. By order dated 4-2-2010, the Appellate Court allowed the appeal of the present petitioners, set aside the order of SDO and remitted the matter b
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.