SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(Chh) 89

Pritinker Diwaker
DEVCHAND – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF M. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Shri Pankaj Agrawal, Advocate, for the Appellant.
Shri Lalit Jangde, P.L., for the Respondent/State.

JUDGMENT

1. This appeal has been preferred against the judgment and order dated 5.3.1997 passed by Additional Sessions Judge Raipur in Sessions Trial No. 415/ 1996 convicting the accused/appellant for the offence punishable under Section 307 IPC and sentencing him to undergo RI for five years and pay fine of Rs. 1000, in default of payment of fine to further undergo SI for three months.

2. Case of the prosecution in brief is that on 22.6.1996 FIR Ex. P-1 was lodged by injured Surendra Bairagi (PW-1) mentioning that he and Jitendra Bairagi (PW-2) are the real brothers and that there existed some dispute regarding a house between his family and that of the accused/appellant for which the matter was pending before the Rent Controlling Authority. It is alleged that on the date of incident when the accused/appellant was arranging tiles on the rooftop of his house, he and Jitendra Bairagi asked him not to do so and on account of that there was some altercation between the parties. Thereafter, it is alleged that the accused/appellant caused stab injury first to Jitendra Bairagi (PW-2) and then to him. Based on this report, offence under Section 307 IPC was registered against the accused/app











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top