IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
Sunil Kumar Sinha and Radhe Shyam Sharma, JJ.
Rajendra and Others - Appellants
Vs.
State of C.G. - Respondent
Criminal Appeal No. 1816 of 1997
Decided On: 03.09.2013
Indian Penal Code, 1860 –Section 147, 148, 149, 302, 307 – Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 – Section 161 and 159 – FIR –Rigorous Imprisonment – Evidence – Massive Intracranial Injury – Deceased Gangaram was returning after grazing catties. When he was passing in front of mill of Neelkanth appellants surrounded him and assaulted him with deadly weapons. Gangaram sustained injuries – He was taken to Primary Health Center Shivrinarayan for medical examination vide examined him and gave his report in which he found incised wound into muscle deep behind left ear, blood was coming out lacerated muscle deep over top of head obliquely situated A bruise over left arm oblique referred Gangaram to District Hospital Bilaspur for further treatment – Held, Contention of that when there has been total non-compliance trial is vitiated – On a perusal of judgment of learned trial Judge we notice that though such a stance had been feebly raised before the learned trial judge, no question was put to Investigating Officer in this regard in cross-examination – Learned trial Judge has adverted to the same and opined, regard being had to creditworthiness of testimony on record that it could not be said that was antedated or embellished. It is worth noting that such a contention was not raised before High Court – Evidence on record find that there are material contradictions in the evidence of Dhan Kunwar Prasad (PW-8) and Babulal – Dhan Kunwar changed her version and Tulsi Prasad specifically deposed that when he reached on place of occurrence assailants had fled from place of occurrence – Looking to evidence of Tulsi Prasad appears that when he reached on place of occurrence assailants were not present on spot and Babulal has given an altogether different story alleging participation of as many as 15 persons in the assault on deceased Gangaram – Ordered Accordingly.
Radhe Shyam Sharma, J.
1. This appeal is directed against judgment dated 26-08-1997 passed by Additional Sessions Judge, Janjgir District Bilaspur, in Sessions Trial No. 64/1991. By the impugned judgment, the appellants were convicted and sentenced in the following manner with a direction to run the sentences concurrently:--
Conviction Sentence
Under Section 148 IPC Rigorous Imprisonment for 2 year and to pay fine of Rs. 500/-, in default of payment of fine to further undergo simple imprisonment for six months
Under Section 302/149 IPC Imprisonment for life and to pay fine of Rs. 500/-, in default of payment of fine to further undergo simple imprisonment for six months
Case of the prosecution, in brief, is as under:
On the date of incident i.e. 01/10/1989 at about 11-12 in the day deceased Gangaram was returning after grazing catties. When he was passing in front of the mill of Neelkanth (PW-17), appellants surrounded him and assaulted him with deadly weapons. Gangaram sustained injuries. He was taken to Primary Health Center (for short P.H.C.) Shivrinarayan for medical examination vide Ex.P.-27. Dr. R. Jeetpure (PW-11) examined him and gave his report (Ex.P-18) in which he found (i) incised wound 5 c.m. X 1 c.m. into muscle deep behind left ear, blood was coming out (2) lacerated wound 5 c.m. X 1½ c.m. X muscle deep over the top of the head obliquely situated (3) A bruise 3 c.m. X 5 c.m. over left arm oblique. He referred Gangaram to District Hospital Bilaspur for further treatment. Gangaram died during the treatment. Intimation was sent to Police Station City Kotwali, Bilaspur vide Ex. P.-30. Merg Intimation (Ex. P-29) was recorded in Police Station City Kotwali, Bilaspur, thereafter regular First Information Report Ex. P-26 was recorded in Police Station Shivrinarayan. The Investigating Officer reached District Hospital Bilaspur, gave notice (Ex. P-3A) to panchas and prepared inquest (Ex. P-4) on the dead body of deceased. The dead body was sent to Government Hospital Bilaspur for post mortem examination vide Ex. P24. Dr. P.R. Bhattacharya (PW-13) conducted post mortem examination on the dead body of the deceased and gave his report (Ex. P-23), in which he found near about 11 injuries on the dead body of deceased. These injuries were ante-mortem and cause of death was massive intracranial injury and the death was homicidal in nature.
In further investigation, blood stained soil and plain soil were seized from the place of occurrence vide Ex. P-1. Memorandum statement of appellant Jondhu was recorded under Section 27 of the Evidence Act vide Ex. P-5 and at his instance lathi was seized vide Ex. P-16, memorandum statement of appellant Ramnath was recorded vide Ex. P-6 and at his instance lathi was seized vide Ex. P-15, memorandum statement of appellant Chhota @ Jivanlal was recorded vide Ex. P-7 and at his instance lathi was seized vide Ex. P-14, memorandum statement of appellant Kodan was recorded vide Ex. P-8 and at his instance lathi was seized vide Ex. P-13, memorandum statement of appellant Madanlal @ Krishndutt was recorded vide Ex. P-9 and at his instance lathi was seized vide Ex. P-12, memorandum statement of appellant Rajendra was recorded vide Ex. P-10 and at his instance Tangi was seized vide Ex. P-11. Spot Map (Ex. P-25) was prepared by Patwari Harish Chand Rathor (PW-18).
After completion of the investigation, charge-sheet was filed against the appellants in the Court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bilaspur, who, in turn, committed the case to the Court of Session Bilaspur, from where it was received on transfer by Additional Sessions Judge, Janjgir, who conducted the trial and convicted and sentenced the appellants as mentioned above.
Appellant Madanlal @ Krishndutt had died during the pendency of this appeal, therefore, his appeal has abated.
2. Shri Neeraj Mehta, learned counsel for the appellants has argued that the finding recorded by trial Court that all the accused persons had assaulted the deceased is incorr
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.