PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA
Manish Jain – Appellant
Versus
State of Chhattisgarh – Respondent
1. The petitioner, who is working as Assistant Grade-III in Janpad Panchayat Nawagarh, is aggrieved by the impugned transfer order issued by the Collector, Bemetara whereby he has been transferred in the same capacity to Janpad Panchayat, Saja.
2. Referring to Rule 27 of the Chhattisgarh Panchayat Service (Recruitment and General Conditions of Service) Rules, 1999, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the CEO, Zila Panchayat is the competent authority to pass the transfer order, therefore, in view of the Rules, the Collector of the district has no jurisdiction or authority to transfer an employee of Janpad Panchayat.
3. Learned State counsel would refer to clause 1 (i) of the transfer policy dated 5.6.2014 wherein it is provided that transfer of class-3 (non-executive) employees at the district level shall be made by the Collector on the recommendation/approval of Minister In-Charge of the district. Therefore, the impugned order is in accordance with transfer policy.
4. It is settled law that the transfer policy issued by the Government has no statutory backing and it is mere guidelines. (See Poonam Verma and others Vs. Delhi Development Authority, (2007)
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.