SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(Chh) 224

PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA
Manish Jain – Appellant
Versus
State of Chhattisgarh – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared
Shri JN Nande, counsel for the petitioner.
Shri YS Thakur, Deputy AG for the State.

ORAL ORDER

1. The petitioner, who is working as Assistant Grade-III in Janpad Panchayat Nawagarh, is aggrieved by the impugned transfer order issued by the Collector, Bemetara whereby he has been transferred in the same capacity to Janpad Panchayat, Saja.

2. Referring to Rule 27 of the Chhattisgarh Panchayat Service (Recruitment and General Conditions of Service) Rules, 1999, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the CEO, Zila Panchayat is the competent authority to pass the transfer order, therefore, in view of the Rules, the Collector of the district has no jurisdiction or authority to transfer an employee of Janpad Panchayat.

3. Learned State counsel would refer to clause 1 (i) of the transfer policy dated 5.6.2014 wherein it is provided that transfer of class-3 (non-executive) employees at the district level shall be made by the Collector on the recommendation/approval of Minister In-Charge of the district. Therefore, the impugned order is in accordance with transfer policy.

4. It is settled law that the transfer policy issued by the Government has no statutory backing and it is mere guidelines. (See Poonam Verma and others Vs. Delhi Development Authority, (2007)





Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top