SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(Chh) 269

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
SANJAY K. AGRAWAL, J.
M/s Jayaswal Neco Industries Ltd. - Petitioner
VERSUS
State of Chhattisgarh & Another - Respondents
Writ Petition (C) No. 1889 of 2013
Decided on: 05.12.2014

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared
Shri Kishore Bhaduri, Shri HS Patel and Shri Rahul Pandey, counsels for the petitioner.
Shri AS Kachhwaha, Additional Advocate General for the Respondents/State of Chhattisgarh.

Headnote:

Constitution of India, 1950 - Article 226/227 - Chhattisgarh Electricity Duty Act, 1949 - Section 3,2(di) and 6 - Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Section 3 and 105 - Chhattisgarh Electricity Duty Rules, 1949 – Rule 7 - A company registered under provisions of Indian Companies Act,1956 situated at village installed Power Plant for producing power from non-conventional sources like Biomass (Rice husk) and is a new industrial unit as defined in new industrial policy - Respondent/State in exercise of power conferred under provisions of Section 3B of ED Act, 1949 read with industrial policy, exempted said company from payment of electricity duty on its own consumption and sale to third party for a period of fifteen years commencing from - Petitioner herein is a company engaged in business of manufacturing of steel and its ancillary products - It is case of petitioner that company entered into an lease agreement with petitioner for leasing out Biomass Based Power Plant on payment of necessary rent for operation subject to conditions mentioned in exemption certificate issued - Industrial unit was commissioned after grant of lease, petitioner company operated power plant and paid rent for operating said power plant - It is further pleaded by petitioner that still remains Legal owner of said power plant - Company has been exempted from payment of electricity duty for a period of 15 years by order cum certificate, there does not exist any occasion for respondents/State to charge electricity duty upon petitioner – Held, On basis of aforesaid analysis it is held that petitioner Industries Limited being lessee of electrical power plant owned by Urja Limited is a “producer” within meaning of Section 2(di) of Chhattisgarh Electricity Duty Act, 1949 and is liable to pay electricity duty under Section 3 of Act as consumed entire electrical energy for its own purpose, and it is further held that exemption granted by State Government from payment of electricity duty to company is not available to petitioner company as has not consumed electrical energy for its own purpose as it has leased out power plant to petitioner company and who has generated electrical energy - As a fallout and consequence of aforesaid discussion writ petition filed by petitioner questioning the demand notice and order of recovery passed by respondent No.2 demanding sum deserves to be dismissed, writ petition is dismissed.

JUDGMENT

1. The pivotal question that falls to be determined in this writ petition is whether the petitioner company being lessee of Biomass Power Plant is not liable to pay the electricity duty under Section 3 of Chhattisgarh Electricity Duty Act, 1949 (hereinafter called as ‘ED Act, 1949’)on consumption of electrical energy on the ground that lesser company (MUUL) is exempted from payment of electricity duty by the State of Chhattisgarh/respondent herein in exercise of power conferred under Section 3B of the ED Act, 1949?

2. The core facts, in nutshell, required for judging legality, validity and correctness of the order dated 22.08.2012 (Annexure P/4) as well as demand notice dated 26.03.2013 (Annexure P/6) are stated as under:

2.1 M/s Maa Usha Urja Limited (for short, MUUL) i.e. a company registered under the provisions of Indian Companies Act,1956 situated at village Girodh, Dharsiwan, District Raipur, installed Power Plant of 7.5 MW for producing power from non-conventional sources like Biomass (Rice husk) and is a new industrial unit as defined in new industrial policy 2004-09.

2.2 The respondent/State in exercise of power conferred under the provisions of Section 3B of the ED Act, 1949 read with industrial policy, 2004-09, exempted the said company “MUUL” from payment of electricity duty on its own consumption and sale to the third party for a period of fifteen years commencing from

2.3 The petitioner herein is a company engaged in business of manufacturing of steel and its ancillary products. It is case of the petitioner that “MUUL” entered into an lease agreement on 04.01.2007 (Annexure P/2) with the petitioner for leasing out the Biomass Based Power Plant on payment of necessary rent for operation and 07.03.2007 to 06.03.2022 subject to conditions mentioned in exemption certificate issued on 29.12.2011 (Annexure P/3). The said industrial unit was commissioned on 07.03.2007 after grant of lease, petitioner company operated the power plant from March2007 to June2012 and paid rent for operating the said power plant. It is further pleaded by the petitioner that MUUL still remains the Legal owner of the said power plant. The said company MUUL has been exempted from payment of electricity duty for a period of 15 years by order cum certificate dated 29.12.2011, thus, there does not exist any occasion for the respondents/State of Chhattisgarh to charge electricity duty upon the petitioner. It is further submitted that petitioner had acquired 31.33 percent shares for the purpose of declaring its power plant a captive generation plant which is permissible under Rule 3 of the Electricity Rules, 2005 (for short, the Rules, 2005) and actually the primary liability to pay such, electricity duty etc. under the relevant provisions of law lies upon the exemptee company (MUUL) from payment of electricity duty.

2.4 It was also pleaded on behalf of the petitioner, that he was surprised to receive the order dated 22.08.2012 (Annexure/4) requiring petitioner to pay electricity duty of Rs. 9,68,59,029/ stating that petition company has taken the said power plant on lease from the said MUUL, which was replied by petitioner company stating that petitioner company has been taken to operate the electrical power plant generator on lease, however, the ownership and title over the said power plant remained with MUUL and since the MUUL enjoys the complete exemption from payment of electricity duty, therefore, no such liability of payment of electricity duty can be fastened upon the petitioner for the period from March, 2007 to June, 2012, and therefore order dated 22.08.2012 (Annexure P/4) as well as demand notice (Annexure P/6) be withdrawn and proceedings be closed.

3. Invoking the extra ordinary jurisdiction of this Court, under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner herein, in the above stated back ground filed the instant writ petition questioning the order dated 22.08.2012 (Annexure P/4) as well as demand notice dated 26.











































































































































































































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top