IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
Chandra Bhushan Bajpai, J.
Satyanand Gupta - Appellants
Vs.
State of Chhattisgarh - Respondent
Criminal Appeal No. 458 of 2002
Decided On : 06.08.2014
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - NDPS Act - Section 5 - Judgment of conviction - Being any iota of evidence – Trial Court - Learned counsel for appellant vehemently argued that pinch witnesses and had not supported story of prosecution they turned hostile - They had not deposed anything against appellant had deposed in that he and both reached to house of Unigram as per instruction of - He saw police in courtyard of Unigram they had a blue bag police informed him that they recovered this bag from house of Unigram - Police had taken his and signature on - A few papers were blank and in some papers two or three lines were written - Head police station said that they were getting late and asked them to sign in papers and said that he will write those papers after signing in those papers as instructed – Held, Considering entire evidence adduced on behalf of prosecution I am of view that evidence adduced on behalf of prosecution is sufficient and acceptable - Prosecution has duly proved that on at Village at about appellant was found in illicit possession of ganja which was offence under Section 20 b ii A of NDPS Act - Hence, judgment of conviction against appellant does not call for any interference - So far as quantum of sentence is concerned trial Court has awarded months rigorous imprisonment along with fine of with default sentence of additional rigorous imprisonment for month looking to quantum of ganja seized from appellant I am of view that sentence awarded to appellant is just and proper and it cannot be termed as a sentence on higher side - As per provisions Court can award sentence of rigorous imprisonment which may extend to months - Looking to quantity of ganja I am of opinion that sentence so awarded to appellant is proper looking at gravity of offence and it does not call for any interference and sentence is not disproportionate to act attributed to appellant - Consequently appeal being devoid of merit is liable to be dismissed and is hereby dismissed - Upon perusal of seizure memo it appears that Investigating Officer after taking two samples of duly seized sealed and affixed seal on all packets - impression of seal is also affixed in seizure memo - This document shows even preparation of packets and how they are prepared and sealed - I am of view that Investigating Officer properly sealed and affixed impression of seal at spot - So far as compliance of Section 55 of NDPS Act is concerned was himself SHO of Police Station Tamar at time of incident since he himself proceeded for investigation of case duly seized contraband article along with samples and he deposited so seized packets for security with Milkman of his police station he prepared receipt - I am of view that there is no force in argument that there is non-compliance of Section 55 of NDPS Act - Appeal dismissed
Chandra Bhushan Bajpai, J.
1. Challenge in this appeal is to the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 26-2-2002 passed by the Special Judge under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (in short 'the NDPS Act'), District Raigarh in Special Criminal Case No. 14/2001 whereby and whereunder, the learned Special Judge under the NDPS Act after holding the appellant guilty for illicit possession of 1 kg. ganja, convicted the appellant under Section 20(b)(i) of the NDPS Act and sentenced him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for 5 months and to pay fine of Rs. 100/-, in default of payment of fine, to further undergo rigorous imprisonment for one month. Conviction is impugned on the ground that without there being any iota of evidence, court below has convicted and sentenced the appellant as aforesaid mentioned and thereby committed illegality.
2. As per case of the prosecution, on 7-10-2001 at about 8.50 p.m., K.P. Dwivedi (PW-1), SHO, Police Station Tamnar, District Raigarh, received information from informant that at Village Karrapali, Police Station Tamnar, the appellant is engaged in illegal transportation of ganja and he is rehiring from Orissa with ganja to his home village. K.P. Dwivedi (PW-1) prepared the informer punchnama vide Ex.-P/1 in the presence of two witnesses, he gave notice (Ex.-P/2 and Ex.-P/3) to panch witnesses Kalachand Rathiya (PW-3) and Pardesi Rathiya (PW-2) to remain present at the time of raid with police raiding party. K.P. Dwivedi (PW-1) gave radio message to SDO (P), Kharsiya for information and necessary action vide Ex.- P/4. Along with the panch witnesses and police party he reached to the Village Karrapali, he gave the appellant notice vide Ex.-P/6 and informed regarding the information received through the informer for illegal possession of ganja by the appellant and also intimated him regarding his legal right that he may be searched before any Gazetted Officer or Magistrate or if he wishes, search can be conducted by K.P. Dwivedi (PW-1). The appellant agreed that he wants to be searched by the said police officer. He gave his consent in the Ex.-P/6. Thereafter, K.P. Dwivedi (PW-1) and the witnesses and staff were searched by the appellant and nothing objectionable sub-stance noticed in the search. Talashi panchnama was prepared vide Ex.-P/7 and Ex-P/8. After the search of the Investigating Officer and panch witness and staff of the Police Station Tamnar, the Investigating Officer conducted search of the appellant. The appellant was having blue coloured zipped bag in which ganja like substance about 1 kg. was recovered. The search panchnama of the appellant was prepared vide Ex.-P/9. Ganja like substance was physically examined by the investigating Officer and the witnesses. They confirmed the presence of ganja positive upon physical examination vide Ex.-P/10. After search of the appellant and before taking weight of substance ganja so recovered again the Investigating Officer, his staff and witnesses were searched by the appellant, nothing objectionable substance was found. Search panchnama was prepared vide Ex.-P/11. The panchnama for weighing apparatus ¼rjktw½ and measurement was prepared vide Ex.-P/5. The weighing instrument and measurement were found to be correct. Ganja so recovered from the appellant with the bag which he was carrying along with him was weighed and found 1 kg. The weighment panchnama of ganja was prepared vide Ex.-P/12. Samples were taken for 25-25 grams. They were sealed separately. The remaining ganja (950 grams) was sealed separately. Impression of the seal marked in the seizure memo, the seizure memo was prepared vide Ex.-P/13. The spot map was prepared by the Investigating Officer vide Ex.-P/14. The appellant was duly arrested vide arrest memo Ex.-P/15. Investigating Officer K.P. Dwivedi (PW-1) recorded the dehati nalishi at the spot vide Ex.-P/17. He along with the appellant, ganja so seized, after completion of the proceeding at
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.