CHANDRA BHUSHAN BAJPAI
Jila Sahakari Kendriya Bank Maryadit – Appellant
Versus
Rajmata Krishna Kumari Devi – Respondent
Chandra Bhushan Bajpai, J.
1. By this first appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure (in brevity 'Code'), the appellant/defendant No. 3 has challenged the legality and propriety of the judgment and decree dated 2-8-1999 whereby and whereunder learned Court below has decreed the suit filed by the respondents No. R-1 and R-2 against the appellant and other respondents and ordered that all the defendants including appellant shall jointly and severally pay the arrears of rent Rs. 87,000/- to respondents No. R-1 and R-2 along with Rs. 21,000/- mesne profit and also to pay mesne profit at the rate of Rs. 200/- per day from the date of presentation of suit till possession of the suit property.
Brief facts of the civil suit filed before the Court below as follows:--
Respondents No. 1 and 2/plaintiff filed a civil suit before the court below in which they had pleaded that the suit house belongs to them which was given to respondent No. 3/Def. No. 1 on rent. He had not paid rent from October, 1993, also closed the suit house and left for elsewhere. Respondent No. 1 and 2 by filing the civil suit prayed for arrears of rent. Even after notice, respondent No. 3/defendant No.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.