2015 Supreme(Chh) 50
IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
Sanjay K. Agrawal, J.
Banti Singh - Appellants
Vs.
State of C.G. - Respondent
M.Cr.C. No. 6846 of 2014
Decided On: 05.01.2015
For the Appellant:Rajesh Jain, Advocate
For the Respondents: Anusuiya Rajput, Panel Lawyer
Headnote:
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - Section 439 – jurisdiction - not entitled to be released on bail - acquainted with the facts of the case - learned counsel appearing for the applicant would submit that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the case as such, there are reasonable grounds for believing that he is not guilty of such offence and he is ready and willing to submit undertaking that he will not commit any such offence if privilege of regular bail is granted by this Court. He would further submit that applicant has no criminal antecedent as no excise offence has previously been committed by him, and therefore, he be released on regular bail - On the other hand, Smt. Anusuiya Rajput, learned counsel appearing for the State/non-applicant would oppose the prayer for grant of bail and submit that the applicant was found in possession of more than 5 bulk liters country made liquor without any authority of law and therefore unless the condition mentioned in Section 59-A(ii) of the Act are satisfied, the applicant is not entitled to be released on bail – Held, Bearing in mind the principles of law laid down in aforesaid cases, if the facts of present case are examined, it is apparent that there is no criminal antecedent of the present applicant and only 9 bulk liters of country made liquor has been seized from him which is more than prescribed limit of 5 bulk liters, but looking to the fact that it is first offence of the applicant and he is in custody from 02.12.2014 and case is triable by the Judicial Magistrate First Class and trial is likely to take some more time and further taking into account the nature and gravity of offence and plea raised by the applicant that he has falsely been implicated in case, I am of the opinion that present is the fit case. in which, the applicant should be enlarged on regular bail - Accordingly, the bail application filed under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C. is allowed. It is directed that on furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 25,000/- with one surety in the like sum to the satisfaction of the concerned Court for his appearance as and when directed, the applicant shall be released on bail, subject to following conditions - That, the accused/applicant shall make himself available for interrogation before the concerned Investigating Officer as and when required and the accused/applicant shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him/her from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer - Application Allowed
Sanjay K. Agrawal, J.
1. Invoking jurisdiction of this Court under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in short 'Cr.P.C.') for grant of regular bail, the applicant has filed this application, who has been arrested in connection with Crime No. 682 of 2014 registered at Police Station Chhaoni, District, Durg (C.G.), for the offence punishable under Section 34(2) of the Chhattisgarh Excise Act, 1915 (in short 'the Act').
2. Case of the prosecution, in brief, is that, applicant was found in possession of 9 bulk liter of country made liquor without valid authority of law, which is offence punishable under Section 34(1)(a) of the Act.
3. Shri Rajesh Jain, learned counsel appearing for the applicant would submit that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the case as such, there are reasonable grounds for believing that he is not guilty of such offence and he is ready and willing to submit undertaking that he will not commit any such offence if privilege of regular bail is granted by this Court. He would further submit that applicant has no criminal antecedent as no excise offence has previously been committed by him, and therefore, he be released on regular bail.
4. On the other hand, Smt. Anusuiya Rajput, learned counsel appearing for the State/non-applicant would oppose the prayer for grant of bail and submit that the applicant was found in possession of more than 5 bulk liters country made liquor without any authority of law and therefore unless the condition mentioned in Section 59-A(ii) of the Act are satisfied, the applicant is not entitled to be released on bail.
5. I have heard learned counsel appearing for the parties and perused the case diary with utmost circumspection.
6. Before considering the submission of the applicant, it is useful to refer Section 34(1) and (2) of the Act, which reads as follows:--
"34. Penalty for unlawful manufacture, transport, possession, sale etc.--(1) Whoever, in contravention of any provisions of this Act, or of any rule, notification or order make or issued thereunder, or of any conditions of a licence, permit or pass granted under this Act,--
(a) manufactures, transports, imports, exports, collects or possesses any intoxicants; or
(b) save in the cases provided for in Section 38, sells any intoxicant: or
(c) cultivates Bhang; or
(d) taps any toddy, producing tree/or draws toddy therefrom, or
(e) constructs or works any distillery, brewery or vintnery; or
(f) uses, keeps or has in his possession any materials, still utensil, implement or apparatus whatsoever for the purpose of manufacturing any intoxicant other than toddy; or
(g) removes any intoxicant from any distillery, brewery, vintnery or warehouse licensed, established or continued, under this Act;
(h) bottles any liquor;
shall subject to the provisions of sub-section (2), be punishable for every such offence with imprisonment for a terms [not less than [six months]] which may extend to [two years] and fine which shall not be less than [Ten thousand rupees] but which may extend to [Fifty thousand rupees]:
Provided that when any person is convicted under this section of any offence for a second or subsequent time, he shall be punishable for every such offence with imprisonment for a terms [not less than [one year]] but which may extend to [five years] and whit fine which shall not be less than [Twenty thousand rupees] but which may extend to [two lac rupees].
(2) Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-section (1), if a person is convicted for an offence covered by clause (a) or clause (b) of Sub-section (1) and the quantity of the intoxicant being liquor found at the time or in the course of detection of the offence exceeds [five bulk liter], he shall be punishable with imprisonment for a terms which shall not be less than one year but which may extend to three years and with fine which shall not be less than twenty five thousand rupees but may extend to one lac rupees:
Provided that when any person is convicted under this S