SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(Chh) 157

IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
Sanjay K. Agrawal, J.
Itwari Beldar - Appellants
Vs.
State of C.G. - Respondent
M.Cr.C. No. 3106 of 2015
Decided On : 07.07.2015

Advocates Appeared:
For The Appellant :Smita Jha, Advocate
For The Respondents:Om P. Sahu, Deputy Govt. Advocate

Headnote:

Chhattisgarh Excise Act, 1915 - Section 34 - Code of Criminal Procedure - Section 439 – Condo Nation of Delay – Jurisdiction - Taking into consideration the condition incorporated in Section 59-A(ii) of C.G. Excise Act, 1915 and bearing in mind the principles of law laid down in Banti Singh v. State of Chhattisgarh if the facts of present case are examined, it is apparent that only 25 bulk liters of illicit liquor has been seized from him which is more than prescribed limit of 5 bulk liters, but looking to the fact that it is first offence of the applicant and he is in custody by the Judicial Magistrate First Class, trial is likely to take some more time and further taking into account the nature and gravity of offence and plea raised by the applicant that he has falsely been implicated in case, I am of the opinion that present is fit case in which applicant should be enlarged on regular bail – Held, Accordingly bail application filed under Section 439 of is allowed - It is directed that on furnishing a personal bond in the sum of with one surety in the like sum to the satisfaction of the concerned Court for his appearance as and when directed, the applicant shall be released on bail, subject to following conditions - That, the applicant shall furnish a specific undertaking that while on bail, he will not commit any excise offence, otherwise bail granted to him shall be liable to be cancelled and shall co-operate the prosecution during trial – That accused/applicant shall make himself available for interrogation before the concerned Investigating Officer as and when required and the accused/applicant shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him/her from disclosing such facts to Court or to any police officer – That accused/applicant shall not act in any manner, which will be prejudicial to fair and expeditious trial – Appeal allowed

ORDER :

Sanjay K. Agrawal, J.

1. The accused/applicant has moved this bail application under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for releasing him on regular bail during trial in connection with Crime No. 86/2015 registered at Police Station Circle Aarang, District Raipur for the offence punishable under Section 34(2) of the Chhattisgarh Excise Act, 1915. Case of the prosecution, in brief, is that 25 bulk liters of illicit liquor was seized by the police from the present applicant.

2. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has falsely been implicated in the case, and therefore, the applicant may be released on bail.

3. On the other hand, learned counsel for the State opposes the bail application.

4. I have heard the counsel appearing for the parties and perused the case diary.

5. Taking into consideration the condition incorporated in Section 59-A(ii) of the C.G. Excise Act, 1915, and bearing in mind the principles of law laid down in Banti Singh v. State of Chhattisgarh (M.Cr.C. No. 6846 of 2014, decided on 05.01.2015), if the facts of present case are examined, it is apparent that only 25 bulk liters of illicit liquor has been seized from him which is more than prescribed limit of 5 bulk liters, but looking to the fact that it is first offence of the applicant and he is in custody from 04.05.2015, case is triable by the Judicial Magistrate First Class, trial is likely to take some more time and further taking into account the nature and gravity of offence and plea raised by the applicant that he has falsely been implicated in case, I am of the opinion that present is the fit case, in which, the applicant should be enlarged on regular bail.

Accordingly, the bail application filed under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C. is allowed. It is directed that on furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 25,000/- with one surety in the like sum to the satisfaction of the concerned Court for his appearance as and when directed, the applicant shall be released on bail, subject to following conditions:

"• That, the applicant shall furnish a specific undertaking that while on bail, he will not commit any excise offence, otherwise bail granted to him shall be liable to be cancelled and shall co-operate the prosecution during trial.

• That, the accused/applicant shall make himself available for interrogation before the concerned Investigating Officer as and when required and the accused/applicant shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him/her from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer.

• That, the accused/applicant shall not act, in any manner, which will be prejudicial to fair and expeditious trial."

Certified copy, as per rules.


Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top