SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(Chh) 139

IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
T.P. Sharma, J.
Ram Gopal Dahariya - Appellants
Vs.
State of C.G. – Respondent
M.Cr.C. No. 1740 of 2015
Decided On : 12.05.2015

Advocates Appeared:
For The Appellant :J.R. Verma, Advocate
For The Respondents: Mahesh Mishra, Panel Lawyer

Long detention and delay in trial can be considered as grounds for granting bail, especially when the case is triable by a lower court.

Headnote:

Bail - Regular Bail - Delay in Trial - IPC Sections 420, 120(B), 34 - Long detention and delay in trial considered for granting bail

Fact of the Case:

The applicant filed for regular bail under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C. as he was in custody for the offence punishable under Sections 420, 120(B), 34 of the IPC. Previous bail applications had been dismissed on merit. The trial of the case had not concluded within stipulated time due to frequent transfer of judges and non-service of summon.

Finding of the Court:

Considering the long period of detention and the delay in trial, the court granted bail to the applicant, directing him to furnish a personal bond and sureties. The court also imposed conditions for bail cancellation in case of defaults.

Issues: Delay in trial, repeated bail applications, and the nature of the offence

Ratio Decidendi: The court considered the long period of detention and the delay in trial as grounds for granting bail, especially as the case was triable by J.M.F.C.

Final Decision: The bail application was allowed, and the applicant was directed to be released on bail upon fulfilling the specified conditions.

ORDER

T.P. Sharma, J.

1. The applicant has filed this application under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C. for grant of regular bail, as he is in custody in connection with Crime No. 80/2012, registered at Police Station: Bhilai Nagar, Section 6, for the offence punishable under Sections 420,120(B), 34 of the IPC. This is the 4th bail application filed on behalf of the applicant for grant of regular bail. Previous bail applications have been dismissed on merit.

2. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that applicant is in custody since 11.05.2014. He further submits that case is triable by J.M.F.C.. The trial Court has not concluded the trial of the case within stipulated time.

3. On the other hand, learned Panel Lawyer for the State oppose the bail application and submits that previous three bail applications filed on behalf of applicant have already been dismissed.

4. Order dated 01.12.2014 passed by the 2nd Additional Sessions Judge, Durg, in Bail Petition No. 1618/2014 perused, which discloses that on account of frequent transfer of judges and non service of summon, trial Court has not concluded the trial of the case and applicant is still languishing in jail. The trial of case will take some time for its conclusion.

5. Considering long period of detention and the case is triable by J.M.F.C, I am of the view that it is a fit case to enlarge the applicant on bail. Accordingly, bail application is allowed. The applicant is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 50,000/- with two solvent sureties of Rs. 25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court concerned. He shall appear before the said Court as and when directed by the said Court. In case of two regular defaults, this bail order shall stand cancelled automatically.

6. At the time of accepting bail bond, the Court concerned shall minutely verify that whether any bail application has been decided previously by the High Court or the Supreme Court and in case the Court finds that previous bail application has been decided, the order shall automatically stand cancelled.

7. At the time of accepting the bail bonds, appellant and sureties shall affix their latest photographs and certified copy of revenue records. The Court concerned shall also submit compliance report within 15 days of its compliance to the Registry of this Court. Certified copy as per rule.


Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top