SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(Chh) 198

MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA
Ramesh Pahuja – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :Maneesh Sharma, Advocate
For the Respondents:Shailendra Dubey, Advocate

JUDGMENT :

Manindra Mohan Shrivastava, J.

1. This appeal is directed against impugned judgment of conviction and sentence dated 11/10/96 passed by the 5th Additional Sessions Judge and Special Judge (CBI), Jabalpur in Special Case No. 48/96 whereby and whereunder the appellant has been held guilty of commission of offence as described below:-

Conviction

Sentence

Under Section 13(1)(d)/13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988

R.I. for two years and fine of Rs. 6,000/-. In default R.I. for one year.

Under Section 7 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988

R.I. for one year and fine of Rs. 4,000/-. In default, R.I. for one year.

Prosecution story, as unfolded from the records of the case is that one Vijay Shankar Awasthi, father of the complainant - Deepak Awasthi (PW4) suffered heart attack on 29/06/95 and was admitted in the hospital at Bhilai. Rs. 1,500/- vide receipt (Ex. P/9) was immediately deposited by the complainant towards treatment on 261/06/95. It is said, complainant -Deepak Awast


































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top